Mokhali v R (C of A (CRI) 2 of 1989) [1990] LSCA 120 (27 July 1990)
The appellant's conduct demonstrated intention to kill and sufficient control; the provocation was not such as to deprive an ordinary person of self-control or bear reasonable relationship to the killing; murder conviction upheld.
- Citation
- [1990] LSCA 120
- Parties
- Appellant: M. Mokhali; Respondent: Rex
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 1990
- Case Number
- C of A (CRI) 2 of 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Provocation, Culpable Homicide
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
M. Mokhali
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had the requisite intention to kill for murder
- 2 Whether provocation reduced the offence to culpable homicide under section 3 of the Criminal Law (Homicide Amendment) Proclamation of 1959
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's conduct demonstrated intention to kill and sufficient control; the provocation was not such as to deprive an ordinary person of self-control or bear reasonable relationship to the killing; murder conviction upheld.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment