Moletsane v Molapo (CIV/T 384 of 88) [1990] LSCA 94 (4 June 1990)
The plaintiff proved on a balance of probabilities that the defendant unlawfully assaulted her. The defendant's claim of self-defence was not pleaded, was inconsistent with the evidence, and was found to be an afterthought. The injuries and circumstances supported the plaintiff's version. Damages were awarded but reduced to a reasonable amount.
- Citation
- [1990] LSCA 94
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mabahlakoana Moletsane; Defendant: Teboho Molapo
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 4 June 1990
- Case Number
- CIV/T 384 of 88
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Assault, Damages, Self Defence, Contumelia
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mabahlakoana Moletsane
Plaintiff
Teboho Molapo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant unlawfully assaulted the plaintiff
- 2 Whether the defendant's claim of self-defence is credible
- 3 Quantum of damages for assault, pain and suffering, contumelia, and medical expenses
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff proved on a balance of probabilities that the defendant unlawfully assaulted her. The defendant's claim of self-defence was not pleaded, was inconsistent with the evidence, and was found to be an afterthought. The injuries and circumstances supported the plaintiff's version. Damages were awarded but reduced to a reasonable amount.
Court Disposition
judgment for plaintiff
Orders
- Plaintiff awarded M2,015.00 in total damages
- Defendant to pay costs of suit
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment