Ramorobi v R (CRI/A 1 of 90) [1990] LSCA 67 (30 March 1990)
Failure to read and explain the charge to the appellant and to record his admission of facts, as well as failure to provide written reasons for judgment, constituted serious procedural irregularities resulting in a miscarriage of justice.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1990] LSCA 67
- Parties
- Appellant: Mabula Ramorobi; Respondent: Rex
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 1990
- Case Number
- CRI/A 1 of 90
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Assault With Intent to Do Grievous Bodily Harm, Plea Procedure, Irregularity in Criminal Proceedings
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mabula Ramorobi
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the charge was read and explained to the appellant as required by law
- 2 Whether the appellant admitted the facts outlined by the prosecutor
- 3 Whether the trial magistrate complied with procedural requirements in recording plea and reasons for judgment
Ratio Decidendi
Failure to read and explain the charge to the appellant and to record his admission of facts, as well as failure to provide written reasons for judgment, constituted serious procedural irregularities resulting in a miscarriage of justice.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Proceedings set aside and trial to start de novo before a different magistrate
- Appeal deposit to be refunded to the appellant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment