Moletsane v Sethati (C of A (CIV) 54 of 2013) [2014] LSCA 49 (24 October 2014)
Once transfer of immovable property has been registered in favour of a purchaser in good faith and without notice of any defect, the sale in execution cannot be set aside, and the respondent failed to prove or allege bad faith or knowledge of defect on the part of the appellant.
- Citation
- [2014] LSCA 49
- Parties
- Appellant: Mafa Sechaba Moletsane; Respondent: ‘Mareekelitsoe Sethathi
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2014
- Case Number
- C of A (CIV) 54 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- Sale in Execution, Transfer of Immovable Property, Good Faith Purchaser, Setting Aside Sale, Onus of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mafa Sechaba Moletsane
Appellant
‘Mareekelitsoe Sethathi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sale in execution of immovable property can be set aside after registration of transfer to a purchaser in good faith and without notice of any defect.
- 2 Whether the legal requirements for sale in execution were complied with, including protection of dwelling house, payment of purchase price, and nulla bona return.
Ratio Decidendi
Once transfer of immovable property has been registered in favour of a purchaser in good faith and without notice of any defect, the sale in execution cannot be set aside, and the respondent failed to prove or allege bad faith or knowledge of defect on the part of the appellant.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld
Orders
- The appeal is upheld with costs.
- The order of the Court a quo is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment