Ramakoala V Monts'o (CCA/0108/2021) [2023] LSHC 141 (14 September 2023)
The application is dismissed because a material dispute of fact regarding the value of the house was foreseeable when the application was lodged, and motion proceedings are inappropriate in such circumstances.
- Citation
- [2023] LSHC 141
- Parties
- Applicant: ‘Mantoa Ramakoala; 1st Respondent: ‘Makhethang Montšo; 2nd Respondent: Land Administration Authority
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2023
- Case Number
- CCA/0108/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Judgment on Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Dispute of Fact, Motion Proceedings, Dismissal of Application, Inheritance, Contract Cancellation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
‘Mantoa Ramakoala
Applicant
‘Makhethang Montšo
1st Respondent
Land Administration Authority
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application should be dismissed due to foreseeable material disputes of fact
- 2 Whether the applicant has locus standi to inherit the rights and interests in the property
- 3 Whether the agreement required installation of ceiling and electricity
Ratio Decidendi
The application is dismissed because a material dispute of fact regarding the value of the house was foreseeable when the application was lodged, and motion proceedings are inappropriate in such circumstances.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment