Khasake-Mokhethi v Moloi (CIV/APN 73 of 13) [2013] LSHC 86 (22 August 2013)
The will is invalid because it fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of sec 3(b) of the Administration of Estates Proclamation No. 19 of 1935, as the testatrix did not expressly state abandonment of African custom; thus, the estate must devolve in accordance with customary law.
- Citation
- [2013] LSHC 86
- Parties
- Applicant: ‘Mantsubise Khasake-Mokhethi; Applicant: Pusetso Khasake-Malakoane; Respondent: Tsabalira Moloi; Respondent: Seithati Nale-Masupha; Respondent: Chemane Nale; Respondent: Nthati Mokitimi; Respondent: Mosiuoa Khasake; Respondent: Standard-Lesotho Bank; Respondent: Nedbank Lesotho Limited; Respondent: Central Bank of Lesotho; Respondent: Land Administration Authority; Respondent: Master of the High Court; Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2013
- Case Number
- CIV/APN 73 of 13
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Motion (application) / Judgment
- Outcome
- Will declared invalid; estate to devolve under customary law; no declaration of customary heirs; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Wills, Customary Succession, Freedom of Testation, Inheritance of Matrimonial Property, Gender Discrimination in Inheritance, Jurisdiction of Courts in Succession Matters
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
‘Mantsubise Khasake-Mokhethi
Applicant
Pusetso Khasake-Malakoane
Applicant
Tsabalira Moloi
Respondent
Seithati Nale-Masupha
Respondent
Chemane Nale
Respondent
Nthati Mokitimi
Respondent
Mosiuoa Khasake
Respondent
Standard-Lesotho Bank
Respondent
Nedbank Lesotho Limited
Respondent
Central Bank of Lesotho
Respondent
Land Administration Authority
Respondent
Master of the High Court
Respondent
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Motion (application) / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the will executed by S. M. Khasake is valid under sec 3(b) of the Administration of Estates Proclamation No. 19 of 1935
- 2 Whether the estate should devolve under customary law or statute
- 3 Whether a married woman can bequeath matrimonial land to her maiden relatives
Ratio Decidendi
The will is invalid because it fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of sec 3(b) of the Administration of Estates Proclamation No. 19 of 1935, as the testatrix did not expressly state abandonment of African custom; thus, the estate must devolve in accordance with customary law.
Court Disposition
Will declared invalid; estate to devolve under customary law; no declaration of customary heirs; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The will is declared invalid.
- The estate is to devolve in accordance with customary law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment