Mataeli Makhele-Sekhantso V Attorney General & 2 Others (C of A (CIV) 23/2024) [2025] LSCA 14 (2 May 2025)
Postponement was granted because the death of counsel and staff shortage constituted sufficient compassionate and logistical grounds, and any prejudice to the appellant could be cured by a costs order.
- Citation
- [2025] LSCA 14
- Parties
- Appellant: Mataeli Makhele-Sekhantso; 1st Respondent: Attorney General; 2nd Respondent: Minister of Local Government and Chieftainship
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 2 May 2025
- Case Number
- C of A (CIV) 23/2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Postponement
- Outcome
- postponement granted
- Legal Topics
- Postponement, Costs, Procedural Fairness, Compassionate Grounds
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mataeli Makhele-Sekhantso
Appellant
Attorney General
1st Respondent
Minister of Local Government and Chieftainship
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Postponement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the death of counsel and staff shortage justify postponement of the appeal
- 2 Whether a costs order suffices to cure any prejudice to the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
Postponement was granted because the death of counsel and staff shortage constituted sufficient compassionate and logistical grounds, and any prejudice to the appellant could be cured by a costs order.
Court Disposition
postponement granted
Orders
- The matter is postponed to the October 2025 session of the Court of Appeal.
- The costs of the postponement are to be paid by the applicants (respondents in the appeal).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment