Millenium Travel And Tours (Pty) Ltd and Another v The Crown (C of A (CRI) 7 of 2011) [2012] LSCA 9 (27 April 2012)

Millenium Travel And Tours (Pty) Ltd and Another v The Crown (C of A (CRI) 7 of 2011) [2012] LSCA 9 (27 April 2012)

The appellants misrepresented ticket costs to the government, inducing payment of inflated amounts, and dishonestly under-declared taxable income. Payments to officials were not genuine loans but corrupt bribes. The trial court's acquittal on bribery counts and sentences imposed on the second appellant were...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] LSCA 9
Parties
Appellant: Millennium Travel and Tours (Pty) Ltd; Appellant: Jayakrishnan Appukuttan Nair; Respondent: The Crown
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Case Number
C of A (CRI) 7 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeals by appellants dismissed; Crown's cross-appeal allowed (except as regards sentences imposed on first appellant); acquittals on bribery counts set aside; convictions and sentences substituted.
Legal Topics
Fraud, Bribery, Tax Fraud, Sentencing
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Fraud Bribery Tax Fraud Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Millennium Travel and Tours (Pty) Ltd

Appellant

Jayakrishnan Appukuttan Nair

Appellant

The Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether misrepresentations alleged were proved
  2. 2 Whether amounts paid to officials were bribes or genuine loans
  3. 3 Whether sentences imposed by trial court were appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The appellants misrepresented ticket costs to the government, inducing payment of inflated amounts, and dishonestly under-declared taxable income. Payments to officials were not genuine loans but corrupt bribes. The trial court's acquittal on bribery counts and sentences imposed on the second appellant were incorrect and must be set aside. Custodial sentences and substantial fines are warranted to disgorge criminal proceeds and reflect the seriousness of fraud and bribery.

Court Disposition

Appeals by appellants dismissed; Crown's cross-appeal allowed (except as regards sentences imposed on first appellant); acquittals on bribery counts set aside; convictions and sentences substituted.

Orders

  • First and second appellants convicted on bribery counts 428 to 431 and sentenced as follows: first appellant fined M220,000 on counts 428 to 431 taken together; second appellant sentenced to eight years imprisonment on counts 428 to 431, served concurrently with imprisonment imposed on counts 1–233 and 457–503.
  • Sentences imposed by trial court on second appellant set aside and replaced: on counts 1–233 and 457–503 taken together, eight years imprisonment and in addition a fine of M3 million or four years imprisonment; on count 457A, three years imprisonment to be served concurrently with sentence imposed on counts 1–233...