Jobo v Letshego Holdings (CCA/0068/2021) [2022] LSHC 59 (18 August 2022)

Jobo v Letshego Holdings (CCA/0068/2021) [2022] LSHC 59 (18 August 2022)

The Accountant-General’s failure to stop deductions was not wilful or mala fide as salary payments had already been processed and reasonable steps were taken to comply with the order. Applicants are not entitled to refunds as respondents were not unjustly enriched; the deductions were used to repay applicants’ valid loan obligations.

Citation
[2022] LSHC 59
Parties
Applicant: Moeketsi Jobo; Applicant: 'Mamopiopone Boseka; Applicant: Mothonyana Mabula; Applicant: Lebohang Rankuatsana; Applicant: Khotso Molikoe; Applicant: 'Malineo Leuta; Applicant: Lebohang Masoabi; Applicant: Halieo Mopeli; Applicant: 'Makoanyane Lechako; Applicant: Hlalele Shale; Applicant: Thomelo Nkofo; Applicant: Ntsokoleng Moerane; Applicant: 'Matsele Tsele; Applicant: Libakana Barete; Applicant: 'Maithabeleng Ramantsane; Applicant: Liteboho Ramonyaluoe; Applicant: Sello Majajane; Applicant: Molahlehi Tseole; Applicant: 'Mashale Ramakhula; Applicant: Apesi Napo; Applicant: Liketso Malataliana; Applicant: 'Maselloane Rakhongoana; Applicant: Malee Khampepe; Applicant: 'Mamonyane Lilemo; Applicant: Sekake Makoanyane; Applicant: Ntlhonamo Rosa Mohejane; 1st Respondent: Letshego Holdings (Pty) Ltd; 2nd Respondent: Lesana Financial Services (Pty) Ltd; 3rd Respondent: Platinum Credit Lesotho (Pty) Ltd; 4th Respondent: Netloans (Pty) Ltd; 5th Respondent: Alimela Thuto Financial Ltd; 6th Respondent: Accountant General; 7th Respondent: National Treasury; 8th Respondent: Commissioner (Central Bank of Lesotho); 9th Respondent: Attorney General
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Judgment Date
18 August 2022
Case Number
CCA/0068/2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Unjust Enrichment, Salary Deductions, Microfinance Regulation
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Moeketsi Jobo

Applicant

'Mamopiopone Boseka

Applicant

Mothonyana Mabula

Applicant

Lebohang Rankuatsana

Applicant

Khotso Molikoe

Applicant

'Malineo Leuta

Applicant

Lebohang Masoabi

Applicant

Halieo Mopeli

Applicant

'Makoanyane Lechako

Applicant

Hlalele Shale

Applicant

Thomelo Nkofo

Applicant

Ntsokoleng Moerane

Applicant

'Matsele Tsele

Applicant

Libakana Barete

Applicant

'Maithabeleng Ramantsane

Applicant

Liteboho Ramonyaluoe

Applicant

Sello Majajane

Applicant

Molahlehi Tseole

Applicant

'Mashale Ramakhula

Applicant

Apesi Napo

Applicant

Liketso Malataliana

Applicant

'Maselloane Rakhongoana

Applicant

Malee Khampepe

Applicant

'Mamonyane Lilemo

Applicant

Sekake Makoanyane

Applicant

Ntlhonamo Rosa Mohejane

Applicant

Letshego Holdings (Pty) Ltd

1st Respondent

Lesana Financial Services (Pty) Ltd

2nd Respondent

Platinum Credit Lesotho (Pty) Ltd

3rd Respondent

Netloans (Pty) Ltd

4th Respondent

Alimela Thuto Financial Ltd

5th Respondent

Accountant General

6th Respondent

National Treasury

7th Respondent

Commissioner (Central Bank of Lesotho)

8th Respondent

Attorney General

9th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Accountant-General’s failure to comply with the court order was deliberate and mala fide
  2. 2 Whether the applicants are entitled to refunds of salary deductions made contrary to a court order

Ratio Decidendi

The Accountant-General’s failure to stop deductions was not wilful or mala fide as salary payments had already been processed and reasonable steps were taken to comply with the order. Applicants are not entitled to refunds as respondents were not unjustly enriched; the deductions were used to repay applicants’ valid loan obligations.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs