Lebitsa v Khetla and Another (A0040/07; LC/REV/27/07) [2009] LSLC 4 (25 March 2009)
The award was set aside because it was based on information obtained during conciliation, which is confidential and inadmissible in arbitration, and because the proceedings did not comply with mandatory procedural requirements.
- Citation
- [2009] LSLC 4
- Parties
- Applicant: MohloMinyane Lebitsa; 1st Respondent: Thabo Khetla; 2nd Respondent: Directorate of Dispute Prevention and Resolution
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2009
- Case Number
- A0040/07 ; LC/REV/27/07
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- award reviewed, corrected and set aside
- Legal Topics
- Confidentiality in Conciliation, Procedural Irregularity, Arbitration Award Review
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MohloMinyane Lebitsa
Applicant
Thabo Khetla
1st Respondent
Directorate of Dispute Prevention and Resolution
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it was irregular for the arbitrator to use information obtained at conciliation to formulate an award
- 2 Whether the arbitration proceedings complied with the Labour Code (Conciliation and Arbitration Guidelines) Notice 2004
Ratio Decidendi
The award was set aside because it was based on information obtained during conciliation, which is confidential and inadmissible in arbitration, and because the proceedings did not comply with mandatory procedural requirements.
Court Disposition
award reviewed, corrected and set aside
Orders
- The award in A0040/07 is reviewed, corrected and set aside.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment