Mohale v R (C of A (CRI) 11 of 2008) [2009] LSCA 13 (23 October 2009)
The trial court misdirected itself in rejecting the appellant's alibi on unsustainable grounds, and the evidence of the single witness was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; thus, the conviction could not stand.
- Citation
- [2009] LSCA 13
- Parties
- Appellant: Molahlehi Mohale; Respondent: Rex
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2009
- Case Number
- C of A (CRI) 11 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Conviction, Alibi, Single Witness Evidence, Withdrawal of Admission, Standard of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Molahlehi Mohale
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was properly convicted of murder based on the evidence of a single witness
- 2 Whether the trial court erred in rejecting the appellant's alibi defence
- 3 Whether the withdrawal of the admission of a deposition was properly allowed
Ratio Decidendi
The trial court misdirected itself in rejecting the appellant's alibi on unsustainable grounds, and the evidence of the single witness was insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; thus, the conviction could not stand.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside
Orders
- The appellant's conviction and sentence are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment