Noe v Noe (CIV/A 177 of 84) [1986] LSCA 51 (7 May 1986)

Noe v Noe (CIV/A 177 of 84) [1986] LSCA 51 (7 May 1986)

The respondent failed to discharge the burden of proof regarding the existence and entitlement to the livestock claimed. The family meeting was validly held, but the evidence was contradictory and insufficient to establish the claim. The trial court's dismissal of the claim is reinstated.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1986] LSCA 51
Parties
Appellant: Molula-Khotla Thibellanoe; Respondent: Jobo Thibellanoe
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Case Number
CIV/A 177 of 84
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Inheritance, Family Meetings, Burden of Proof
Source Language
en
Succession Customary Law Inheritance Family Meetings Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Molula-Khotla Thibellanoe

Appellant

Jobo Thibellanoe

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent proved entitlement to the livestock claimed as inheritance
  2. 2 Whether the family meeting was validly constituted under S.14(4) of the Laws of Lerotholi
  3. 3 Whether the animals claimed belonged to the senior house or were unallocated property

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent failed to discharge the burden of proof regarding the existence and entitlement to the livestock claimed. The family meeting was validly held, but the evidence was contradictory and insufficient to establish the claim. The trial court's dismissal of the claim is reinstated.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Judgment of Judicial Commissioner's court set aside
  • Judgment of trial court dismissing respondent's claim reinstated