Leoma v Officer Commanding VTD (CIV/APN 17 of 18) [2018] LSHC 5 (26 June 2018)
The respondents' withdrawal of points of law and subsequent filing of an answering affidavit was an irregular procedure that prejudiced the applicant and contravened the rules. The answering affidavit was struck out and the matter was ordered to proceed on the original points of law.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] LSHC 5
- Parties
- Applicant: Moluoane Henry Leoma; 1st Respondent: O/C RCTS; 2nd Respondent: Commissioner of Police; 3rd Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2018
- Case Number
- CIV/APN 17 of 18
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Irregular Proceedings and Striking Out Affidavit
- Outcome
- Application granted with costs
- Legal Topics
- Irregular Proceedings, Affidavit Filing Procedures, Points of Law, Rule 8(10)(c), Rule 30
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moluoane Henry Leoma
Applicant
O/C RCTS
1st Respondent
Commissioner of Police
2nd Respondent
Attorney General
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Irregular Proceedings and Striking Out Affidavit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents' withdrawal of points of law and late filing of an answering affidavit was irregular
- 2 Whether the answering affidavit should be struck out as an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents' withdrawal of points of law and subsequent filing of an answering affidavit was an irregular procedure that prejudiced the applicant and contravened the rules. The answering affidavit was struck out and the matter was ordered to proceed on the original points of law.
Court Disposition
Application granted with costs
Orders
- Application is granted with costs.
- Respondents are directed to argue the matter as it originally was in terms of the points of law raised.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment