Kao v Principal Secretary Ministry of Foreign Affairs (CIV/APN 360 of 17) [2018] LSHC 18 (8 February 2018)

Kao v Principal Secretary Ministry of Foreign Affairs (CIV/APN 360 of 17) [2018] LSHC 18 (8 February 2018)

The appointment of an Ambassador is incomplete without commissioning by His Majesty the King as required by Section 143 of the Constitution; the court has no power to validate such an incomplete appointment, and the Minister's Credentials Notes cannot substitute Royal Commissioning.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] LSHC 18
Parties
Applicant: Moshe Kao; 1st Respondent: Principal Secretary Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Relations; 2nd Respondent: Public Service Commission; 3rd Respondent: Attorney General
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Case Number
CIV/APN 360 of 17
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Ambassadorial Appointments, Royal Prerogative, Separation of Powers, Validity of Diplomatic Appointments
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Ambassadorial Appointments Royal Prerogative Separation of Powers Validity of Diplomatic Appointments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Moshe Kao

Applicant

Principal Secretary Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Relations

1st Respondent

Public Service Commission

2nd Respondent

Attorney General

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was lawfully appointed as Ambassador and Permanent Representative of Lesotho in Geneva
  2. 2 Whether the court can validate an incomplete ambassadorial appointment lacking Royal Commissioning

Ratio Decidendi

The appointment of an Ambassador is incomplete without commissioning by His Majesty the King as required by Section 143 of the Constitution; the court has no power to validate such an incomplete appointment, and the Minister's Credentials Notes cannot substitute Royal Commissioning.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for review and setting aside of termination is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.