Sula v Tlali (C of A (CIV) 16 of 91) [1991] LSCA 14 (1 January 1991)
Tlali failed to establish any contractual or legal right to the property in question, and the High Court erred in granting relief on the papers where material disputes of fact existed. The appeal was allowed and the application dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- [1991] LSCA 14
- Parties
- Appellant: Mphale Sula; Respondent: Mateboho Tlali
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 1991
- Case Number
- C of A (CIV) 16 of 91
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Contract Formation, Costs, Urgent Applications
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mphale Sula
Appellant
Mateboho Tlali
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent established a contractual or other legal right to occupation or ownership of the disputed property
- 2 Whether the High Court erred in granting the application for occupation and related relief
- 3 Whether the costs order was properly made
Ratio Decidendi
Tlali failed to establish any contractual or legal right to the property in question, and the High Court erred in granting relief on the papers where material disputes of fact existed. The appeal was allowed and the application dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The appeal is allowed with costs.
- The order of the court a quo is set aside and replaced with: 'The rule nisi is discharged and the application is dismissed with costs.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment