Ntjebe and Others v Lesotho Highlands Authority (LAC/CIV/A 12 of 2004) [2009] LSLAC 4 (6 February 2009)

Ntjebe and Others v Lesotho Highlands Authority (LAC/CIV/A 12 of 2004) [2009] LSLAC 4 (6 February 2009)

The appellants were entitled to overtime pay as they remained at their workstations for 24-hour shifts and were not shown to be management or confidential employees exempt from overtime. The Labour Court erred in applying estoppel and management exemption. The retrenchment was procedurally unfair due to inadequate...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] LSLAC 4
Parties
Appellants: Tsotang Ntjebe and 30 Others; Appellants: Telang Leemisa & Others; Respondent: Lesotho Highlands Authority
Court
Labour Appeal Court
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Judgment Date
6 February 2009
Case Number
LAC/CIV/A 12 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Labour Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal upheld with costs
Legal Topics
Overtime Pay, Unfair Dismissal, Procedural Fairness, Amendment of Pleadings, Retrenchment, Compensation
Source Language
english
Labour Law Overtime Pay Unfair Dismissal Procedural Fairness Amendment of Pleadings Retrenchment Compensation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tsotang Ntjebe and 30 Others

Appellants

Telang Leemisa & Others

Appellants

Lesotho Highlands Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Appeal / Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellants were entitled to overtime pay for 24-hour shifts over 15 days per month
  2. 2 Whether the appellants' retrenchment was procedurally and substantively unfair
  3. 3 Whether amendment of pleadings on appeal was permissible

Ratio Decidendi

The appellants were entitled to overtime pay as they remained at their workstations for 24-hour shifts and were not shown to be management or confidential employees exempt from overtime. The Labour Court erred in applying estoppel and management exemption. The retrenchment was procedurally unfair due to inadequate notice after withdrawal of previous notices, and appellants are entitled to compensation. Amendment of pleadings on appeal was permissible as no prejudice was shown and issues were canvassed at trial.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld with costs

Orders

  • Matter remitted to Labour Court for quantification of overtime pay and compensation
  • Both parties to provide relevant documentation and evidence for computation