R v Mosothoane and Another (CRI/APN 242 of 86) [1986] LSCA 141 (27 October 1986)
Applicants were not committed for trial under section 78 but were to be summarily tried under section 144; therefore, they are not entitled to discharge under section 141.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1986] LSCA 141
- Parties
- Applicant: Phatela Mosothoane; Applicant: Lekena Mathibela; Respondent: Rex
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 1986
- Case Number
- CRI/APN 242 of 86
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Judgment on Application for Discharge From Imprisonment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Trial, Summary Trial, Discharge From Imprisonment
- Source Language
- english
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Committal for Trial Summary Trial Discharge From Imprisonment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Parties
Phatela Mosothoane
Applicant
Lekena Mathibela
Applicant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Judgment on Application for Discharge From Imprisonment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicants are entitled to discharge from imprisonment under section 141 read with section 279 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act 1981
- 2 Whether summary trial under section 144 is equivalent to committal for trial under section 78
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants were not committed for trial under section 78 but were to be summarily tried under section 144; therefore, they are not entitled to discharge under section 141.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- application for discharge from imprisonment is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment