R v Kulehile (CRI/T 40 of 7) [2018] LSHC 33 (7 May 2018)
The accused was found to have been in possession of the firearm used to shoot the deceased, failed to provide an explanation for this, and the circumstantial evidence established beyond reasonable doubt that he was the shooter. His conduct was reckless as to whether death would result, satisfying the intent for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] LSHC 33
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Accused: Mosaletsane Kulehile
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 7 May 2018
- Case Number
- CRI/T 40 of 7
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Guilty on both counts
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Unlawful Possession of Firearm, Circumstantial Evidence, Right to Silence
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Mosaletsane Kulehile
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused unlawfully killed the deceased with intent to kill
- 2 Whether the accused was in unlawful possession of a firearm without a certificate
Ratio Decidendi
The accused was found to have been in possession of the firearm used to shoot the deceased, failed to provide an explanation for this, and the circumstantial evidence established beyond reasonable doubt that he was the shooter. His conduct was reckless as to whether death would result, satisfying the intent for murder. He also failed to produce a firearm certificate, proving unlawful possession.
Court Disposition
Guilty on both counts
Orders
- Accused found guilty of murder
- Accused found guilty of unlawful possession of a firearm
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment