R v Mafaesa (CRI/S 4 of 82) [1983] LSCA 54 (14 June 1983)
The High Court declines to sentence the accused because the magistrate has jurisdiction to impose the maximum sentences prescribed by statute, and remitting the matter for sentencing is unjustified.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1983] LSCA 54
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Accused: Thabo Mafaesa
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Case Number
- CRI/S 4 of 82
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- The High Court declines to sentence the accused.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Jurisdiction of Magistrates
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Thabo Mafaesa
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court should sentence the accused when the magistrate has jurisdiction
- 2 Whether previous convictions are relevant to sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court declines to sentence the accused because the magistrate has jurisdiction to impose the maximum sentences prescribed by statute, and remitting the matter for sentencing is unjustified.
Court Disposition
The High Court declines to sentence the accused.
Orders
- Matter remitted to the magistrate for sentencing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CRI/S/4/82 IN THE HIGH COURT OF LESOTHO In the matter of : REX V THABO MAFAESA J U D G M E NT Delivered by the Hon. Mr. Justice M. P. Mofokeng on the 14th day of June, 1983. The Court declines to sentence the accused. The learned Magistrate could easily have cone that. It is true that the accused has numerous previous convictions but some of these are irrelevant to the sentence. The maximum sentence which may be imposed on Count I is M200 or 6 months or both (determined by statute), and on Count II is N10 or 1 month or both. This is clearly within the learned Magistrate's jurisdiction and this passing of the buck will not be tolerated by the High Court. The mere fact that the learned magistrate thought a stiff sentence or a deterrent sentence is needed, is no Justification to remit a matter to this court for sentence. It has previously been said in pronouncements of this court that magistrates should not turn the High Court into a sentencing machine. The Crown does not support this action adopted by this particular judicial official. It is an admirable attitude. / 2. -2- JUDGE. For the Crown: Adv. Kabatsi