R v Ramarou (CRI/T 70 of 91) [1995] LSCA 55 (9 March 1995)

R v Ramarou (CRI/T 70 of 91) [1995] LSCA 55 (9 March 1995)

The accused is not guilty of murder as the prosecution failed to prove subjective intent to kill beyond reasonable doubt. However, the accused acted negligently and recklessly in using a heavy stone on the deceased, amounting to culpable homicide.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1995] LSCA 55
Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Accused: Moeketsi Ramarou
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Case Number
CRI/T 70 of 91
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment and Sentencing
Outcome
convicted of culpable homicide
Legal Topics
Culpable Homicide, Murder, Self Defence, Provocation, Sentencing
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Culpable Homicide Murder Self Defence Provocation Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Moeketsi Ramarou

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment and Sentencing

  1. 1 Whether the accused is guilty of murder or culpable homicide
  2. 2 Whether the accused acted in self-defence
  3. 3 Whether provocation reduced the accused's culpability

Ratio Decidendi

The accused is not guilty of murder as the prosecution failed to prove subjective intent to kill beyond reasonable doubt. However, the accused acted negligently and recklessly in using a heavy stone on the deceased, amounting to culpable homicide.

Court Disposition

convicted of culpable homicide

Orders

  • accused sentenced to four years imprisonment