R v Motsepe and Another (CRI/A 434 of 96) [1997] LSHC 37 (7 April 1997)

R v Motsepe and Another (CRI/A 434 of 96) [1997] LSHC 37 (7 April 1997)

The conviction for rape was upheld because the complainant's evidence was corroborated by other witnesses, and the lack of medical evidence did not create reasonable doubt. The court found the appellants' denial false beyond doubt and the trial court's findings were justified. Sentences were ordered to run concurrently for clarity.

Citation
[1997] LSHC 37
Parties
1st Appellant: Mokhele Motsepe; 2nd Appellant: Kelebone Lethoba; Respondent: Rex
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Judgment Date
7 April 1997
Case Number
CRI/A 434 of 96
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Rape, Assault With Intent to Do Grievous Bodily Harm, Sentencing, Corroboration in Sexual Offences
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mokhele Motsepe

1st Appellant

Kelebone Lethoba

2nd Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for rape was supported by evidence beyond reasonable doubt
  2. 2 Whether the lack of medical evidence created reasonable doubt
  3. 3 Whether the sentences should run concurrently or consecutively

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction for rape was upheld because the complainant's evidence was corroborated by other witnesses, and the lack of medical evidence did not create reasonable doubt. The court found the appellants' denial false beyond doubt and the trial court's findings were justified. Sentences were ordered to run concurrently for clarity.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Convictions and sentences affirmed
  • Sentences to run concurrently