R v Tseki (CRI/T 19 of 90) [1991] LSCA 65 (13 June 1991)
The accused was unduly attacked by the deceased, who was armed and obstructed his exit. The accused's response was reasonable and proportionate to the threat, and he ceased force once the danger ended. There was no prior animosity, and the accused immediately reported to the police, supporting his version of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1991] LSCA 65
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Accused: Sebateli Tseki
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Case Number
- CRI/T 19 of 90
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- not guilty
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Self Defence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Sebateli Tseki
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused unlawfully killed the deceased
- 2 Whether the accused acted in self-defence
- 3 Whether the force used was reasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The accused was unduly attacked by the deceased, who was armed and obstructed his exit. The accused's response was reasonable and proportionate to the threat, and he ceased force once the danger ended. There was no prior animosity, and the accused immediately reported to the police, supporting his version of self-defence.
Court Disposition
not guilty
Orders
- The accused is found not guilty and is discharged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
C R I / T / 1 9 / 90 IN T HE H I GH C O U RT OF L E S O T HO In t he m a t t er of R E X v S E B A T E LI T S E KI J U D G M E NT H E LD AT B U T HA B U T HE D e l i v e r ed by t he H o n. M r. J u s t i ce M . L. L e h o h la on t he 13th d ay of June, T he a c c u s ed w as c h a r g ed w i th t he M u r d er of one T e b o ho M p h e ng w ho s u c c u m b ed to t he s t ab w o u nd i n f l i c t ed on h is c h e st on t he f i f th of M a r c h , 1 9 89 at or hear M a n k o a n e ng in t he L e r i be d i s t r i c t. T he d e f e n ce a d m i t t ed t he e n t i re p r e p a r a t o ry e x a m i n a t i on d e p o s i t i o n s. T he C r o wn a c c e p t ed t he a d m i s s i o ns a nd a c c o r d i n g ly t he C r o wn c l o s ed its c a s e. It is w o r th m e n t i o n i ng t h at t he p r e p a r a t o ry e x a m i n a t i on d e p o s i t i o ns w e re m a de p a rt of t h is r e c o rd by an o r d er a d o p t i ng t h em as s u ch w i t h o ut n e c e s s a r i ly h a v i ng b e en r e ad i n to t he m a c h i n e. T he a c c u s ed g a ve e v i d e n ce in h is d e f e n ce p a rt of w h i ch is c o n s i s t e nt w i th t h at of t he C r o w n. On t h at f a t e f ul d ay t he a c c u s ed c a me l a t er to the scene a c c o m p a n i ed by a f r i e nd of h i s; and h is f r i e nd w as / c o n f r o n t ed - 2 - c o n f r o n t ed by t he d e c e a s ed w i th h a v i ng n ot p a id up t he b i ll he h ad b e en s a d d l ed w i th a f t er t he a c c u s e d 's f r i e n d 's d og h ad b i t t en t he d e c e a s e d. one of t he p a r t i es w ho w e re in t h e re c a l l ed t he c o m b a t i ng f e l l o ws o u t s i de a nd t he a c c u s ed r e m a i n ed s i t t i ng in t he h o u s e. A f t er a s h o rt w h i le t he d e c e a s ed c a me i n to t he h o u s e, m a de a b e e - l i ne f or t he a c c u s ed a nd d u r i ng a s h o rt e x c h a n ge of w o r ds t he a c c u s ed s a ys t h at t he d e c e a s ed a s k ed w h e t h er he is l i ke h is o t h er f r i e nd t o o. W h en t he a c c u s ed w as b e w i l d e r ed by t h i s, t he d e c e a s ed d e l i v e r ed a k n i fe b l ow t o w a r ds t he u p p er b o dy of t he a c c u s ed w ho d o d g e d. T he a c c u s ed p u s h ed h im b a c k, a nd t he d e c e a s ed w as s t a n d i ng a c r o ss t he o n ly p a th t h at w o u ld h a ve a l l o w ed t he a c c u s ed to m o ve o u t. T he d e c e a s ed is s a id to h a ve b e en h o l d i ng a k n i fe at t he r e a d y, a nd t he a c c u s ed f e e l i ng t h at h is l i fe w as e n d a n g e r ed a v o i d ed t he s e c o nd b l ow a nd s t a b b ed the d e c e a s ed o n ce on t he c h e s t. As to t he r e a s on w hy t he a c c u s ed d id n ot a v a il h i m s e lf of m e a ns of m o v i ng o ut of t he h o u s e, it a p p e a rs to me t h at t h e re w as no w ay he c o u ld m o ve o ut b e c a u se t he d e c e a s ed w as o b s t r u c t i ng h is p a t h; a nd t he w ay t he f u r n i t u re w as c r a m m ed in t h at p l a ce it a l so c o u l d n 't a f f o rd h im e n o u gh m o v e m e nt to e f f e ct h is e x it w i t h o ut e x p o s i ng h is b a ck to t he d e c e a s ed w ho w as o n ly t wo p a c es a w ay w h en he w as p u s h ed b a ck by t he a c c u s e d. T he C r o wn witnesses s h o w ed t h at t h ey s aw t he a c c u s ed h o l d i ng t h is b l a ck k n i f e. T he a c c u s ed d o e s n 't d e ny t h at he w as h o l d i ng t h at b l a ck k n i f e. He s a ys t h at h is is t he b r o wn one t h o u g h. It is s i g n i f i c a nt t h at t he b l a ck k n i fe is a f l i ck t y pe a nd one t h at d o e s n 't w a s te t i me b e f o re b e i ng m a de r e a dy to s t ab or u s e. T he a c c u s ed on t he o t h er h a nd h ad to u se h is t e e th to o p en h is b r o wn o k a pi k n i fe in o r d er to q u e ll t he a t t a ck t h at he s a ys he a p p r e h e n d ed f r om t he d e c e a s e d. T he k n i fe t h at t he d e c e a s ed w as h o l d i ng d r o p p ed a f t er he h ad b e en s t a b b ed a nd f o u nd i ts w ay in a / p o ol - 3 - p o ol of b l o od f l o w i ng f r om t he d e c e a s e d. T he a c c u s e d, f e a r i ng t h at t h is k n i fe m i g ht be s p i r i t ed a w ay by s o m e o ne w h o se i n t e r e s ts p r o b a b ly a re a d v e r se to h is p i c k ed it up a nd h e ld it t o g e t h er w i th h is o wn a nd t o ok t h em to t he p o l i ce s t a t i o n. T h is a c c o u n ts f or t he b l o od t h at is f o u nd on t he b l a ck k n i f e. It a l so a c c o u n ts f or t he f a ct t h at t he C r o wn witnesses at one s t a ge s aw h im h o l d i ng t he b l a ck k n i f e. T he a c c u s ed a d m i t t ed the a d m i t t ed e v i d e n ce t h at t he k n i fe b e l o n g ed to h i m, i n c l u d i ng t h at t he b l a ck k n i fe b e l o n g ed to h i m. T h us h is e x p l a n a t i on as to h ow t he C r o wn witnesses m i g ht h a ve a s s o c i a t ed t h is k n i fe w i th h im is a c c e p t a b le to m e. T h e re is no h i s t o ry of p r i or a n i m o s i ty b e t w e en t he a c c u s ed a nd t he d e c e a s e d. T he e v i d e n ce t h at h as b e en a d d u c ed f r om t he C r o w n 's s i de is t h at t he d e c e a s ed w as e x t r e m e ly d r u n k, h e n ce h is b e i ng r e p r i m a n d ed by t he o w n er of t he d og a b o ut w hy t he d e c e a s ed s h o u ld c o n f r o nt h im a b o ut t he d og b i te in p u b l i c, a nd c o n s i s t e nt w i th t he d e c e a s e d 's a t t i t u de on t h at d ay he n ow f o u nd t h at t he n e xt t a r g et m u st be t he m an w ho c a me a l o ng w i th t he o w n er of t he d og a nd on a c c o u nt m e r e ly of t h at s h o u ld be c o n f r o n t ed w i th t h at q u e s t i on of t he d og b i te a g a in - at l e a st i m p l i e d ly in t he s e n se t h at t he q u e s t i on p ut to t he a c c u s ed w as w h e t h er he t oo is l i ke h is f r i e n d. It s h o u ld be b o r ne in m i nd t h at t he q u e s t i on w h i ch h ad b e en p ut to t he a c c u s e d 's f r i e nd w as t he one c o n f r o n t i ng h im w i th t he w o u nd t h at w as n ot p a id f or a l b e it s u s t a i n ed by t he d e c e a s ed f r om t he o w n e r 's d o g. T he C o u rt g a i n ed a d i s t i n ct f e e l i ng t h at t he a c c u s ed w as u n d u ly a t t a c k ed by t he d e c e a s e d. T he q u e s t i on of t h is b l a ck k n i fe w h i ch d o es n ot b e l o ng to t he a c c u s ed s e e ms to s u p p o rt t he v e r s i on t h at t he k n i fe b e l o n g ed to t he d e c e a s e d. T he f a ct t h at it is n ot s h o wn w h en it w as f l i c k ed o p en b ut t h at w h en c o l l e c t ed it w as a l r e a dy o p en s h o ws t h at s o m e o ne m u st h a ve o p e n ed i t. It a l so s u p p o r ts t he a c c u s e d 's v e r s i on t h at he w as p l a c ed in d a n g er of h is l i fe by an a t t a c k er w ho h e ld t h at k n i f e. In t he c i r c u m- s t a n c es it w o u ld be i d le to d e ny t h at t h e re w as e x i s t e n ce of / s e l f- - 4 - s e l f - d e f e n c e. T he s e c o nd q u e s t i on is w h e t h e r, in f a c t, if t h e re w as s u ch s e l f - d e f e n c e, it w as r e a s o n a b l e. I t h i nk t he a n s w er to t h at q u e s t i on is t h at it m u st h a ve b e en r e a s o n a b le b e c a u se I c a n 't e n v i s a ge an a t t e m pt to q u e ll an a t t a ck by a k n i fe w i th a k n i fe b e i ng o t h e r w i se u n r e a s o n a b l e. N o w, if t he a t t a ck w as r e a s o n a b le I d o n 't t h i nk t he C o u rt n e ed c o n s i d er w h e t h er t he u se of t he w e a p on t h at c a u s ed t he d e a th in t he c i r c u m s t a n c es w as e x c e s s i ve m o d e r a t e ly or i m m o d e r a t e l y, m o re e s p e c i a l ly r e g a rd b e i ng had to t he f a ct t h at o n ly o ne w o u nd w as i n f l i c t ed in t he p r o c e s s, and t h at t he law r e q u i r es t h at t he m e a ns u s ed m u st be c o n s o n a nt w i th t he d a n g er a p p r e h e n d e d, and f u r t h er t h at w h en t he a p p r e h e n d ed d a n g er had s u b s i d ed the c o u n t er - a t t a c k er m u st s t op and i n d i c a t i o ns s h ow t he a c c u s ed s t o p p ed as t h e re w as no f u r t h er u se m a de of t he o n ly w e a p on he h a d. C o n s i s t e n t ly w i th w h at s h o u ld r e d o u nd to t he a c c u s e d 's c r e d it is t h at he w e nt s t r a i g ht to t he p o l i ce C h a r ge O f f i ce i m m e d i a t e ly a f t er his e n c o u n t er w i th t he d e c e a s e d. T he a c c u s ed w as a c c o m p a n i ed t h e re by p e o p le w ho had c o me to t he f e a s t. He h a n d ed o v er b o th t he b l a ck k n i fe and t he b r o wn k n i f e. N o w h e re is it s u g g e s t ed he c o l l e c t ed t he b l a ck k n i fe a l o ng t he way w i th t he h o pe t h at it s h o u ld s e r ve as a red h e r r i ng a c r o ss the t r a il and t h us i n t e n d ed to b u t t r e ss his s e l f - d e f e n ce v e r s i o n. W i t n e s s es had s e en him h o l d i ng the b l a ck k n i fe i m m e d i a t e ly b e f o re his d e p a r t u re to t he C h a r ge O f f i c e. His m a n n er of h o l d i ng it w as s u ch t h at it o b s t r u c t ed t he b r o wn o ne f r om v i e w. T h e re is p l e n ty of a u t h o r i t i es g u a r d i ng a g a i n st J u d i c i al o f f i c e rs a d o p t i ng an a r m ed chair c r i t i c 's p o s t u re in m a t t e rs of t h is k i nd and t h at r e g a rd m u st be had to t he h e at of t he m o m e nt and t h at J u d i c i al o f f i c e rs m u st p ut t h e m s e l v es in t he b o o ts of t he a c c u s e d. It's t oo bad if the a c c u s e d 's b o o ts a re e i t h er t oo big or t oo s m a l l. The a c c u s ed is f o u nd n ot g u i l ty t h e r e f o re and is d i s c h a r g e d. For C r o wm : M r . M o k h o bo For D e f e n c e : A d v . G . N . M o f o lo JUDGE 13th J u n e, 1991