R v Tseki (CRI/T 19 of 90) [1991] LSCA 65 (13 June 1991)

R v Tseki (CRI/T 19 of 90) [1991] LSCA 65 (13 June 1991)

The accused was unduly attacked by the deceased, who was armed and obstructed his exit. The accused's response was reasonable and proportionate to the threat, and he ceased force once the danger ended. There was no prior animosity, and the accused immediately reported to the police, supporting his version of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1991] LSCA 65
Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Accused: Sebateli Tseki
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Case Number
CRI/T 19 of 90
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Outcome
not guilty
Legal Topics
Murder, Self Defence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Murder Self Defence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Sebateli Tseki

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the accused unlawfully killed the deceased
  2. 2 Whether the accused acted in self-defence
  3. 3 Whether the force used was reasonable

Ratio Decidendi

The accused was unduly attacked by the deceased, who was armed and obstructed his exit. The accused's response was reasonable and proportionate to the threat, and he ceased force once the danger ended. There was no prior animosity, and the accused immediately reported to the police, supporting his version of self-defence.

Court Disposition

not guilty

Orders

  • The accused is found not guilty and is discharged.