Lechesa v Lesotho National Development Corporation (LC 95 of 6) [2007] LSLC 9 (4 May 2007)
The Labour Court lacks jurisdiction to hear severance pay claims after the enactment of Act No.5 of 2006, as such claims must now be determined by arbitration before the DDPR. The amendment is procedural and applies to all cases going to trial after its promulgation, including those where the cause of action arose earlier. The applicant's substantive right to claim severance pay is not impaired, as the claim can still be pursued before the DDPR, subject to possible condonation for late referral.
- Citation
- [2007] LSLC 9
- Parties
- Applicant: Retselisitsoe Lechesa; Respondent: Lesotho National Development Corporation
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 4 May 2007
- Case Number
- LC 95 of 6
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Claim (severance Pay) / Preliminary Objection on Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Application struck out for want of jurisdiction
- Legal Topics
- Severance Pay, Jurisdiction, Retrospective Application of Procedural Law, Prescription/limitation of Actions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Retselisitsoe Lechesa
Applicant
Lesotho National Development Corporation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Claim (severance Pay) / Preliminary Objection on Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Court has jurisdiction to hear a severance pay claim after the enactment of Act No.5 of 2006
- 2 Whether the amendment to section 226(2)(c) of the Labour Code applies retrospectively to pending claims
- 3 Whether the applicant's right to claim severance pay is impaired by the change in forum/procedure
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court lacks jurisdiction to hear severance pay claims after the enactment of Act No.5 of 2006, as such claims must now be determined by arbitration before the DDPR. The amendment is procedural and applies to all cases going to trial after its promulgation, including those where the cause of action arose earlier. The applicant's substantive right to claim severance pay is not impaired, as the claim can still be pursued before the DDPR, subject to possible condonation for late referral.
Court Disposition
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction
Orders
- Applicant to pursue claim before the DDPR by arbitration
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment