Lijane v Rasetsoto (LC/APN/32/2014) [2022] LSHC 86 (16 August 2022)
The applicant is entitled to ownership of the estate as it was bequeathed to his late wife, and the respondent’s lease was fraudulently obtained through non-disclosure of material facts and prior adverse judgments. The respondent’s failure to challenge the will or marriage in a competent court and his lack of candour disqualify his claim.
- Citation
- [2022] LSHC 86
- Parties
- Applicant: Rets’elisitsoe Lijane; Respondent: Ramarane Rasetsoto
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2022
- Case Number
- LC/APN/32/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Land Dispute / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Bequeathal of Property, Fraudulent Acquisition of Lease, Inheritance Rights, Non Disclosure of Material Facts
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rets’elisitsoe Lijane
Applicant
Ramarane Rasetsoto
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Dispute / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is the rightful owner of the disputed estate
- 2 Whether the respondent fraudulently obtained a lease over the estate
- 3 Effect of non-disclosure of previous court decisions on the lease process
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is entitled to ownership of the estate as it was bequeathed to his late wife, and the respondent’s lease was fraudulently obtained through non-disclosure of material facts and prior adverse judgments. The respondent’s failure to challenge the will or marriage in a competent court and his lack of candour disqualify his claim.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Applicant declared rightful owner of the site in question
- Lease number 13291-1758 issued to Ramarane Rasetsoto cancelled
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment