Rex v Morabe (CRI/T/0018/2020) [2022] LSHC 90 (22 April 2022)
The accused's admission was voluntary and admissible; his version was not credible as it was not put to Crown witnesses and was contradicted. The evidence did not prove subjective intention to kill but established negligence, amounting to culpable homicide.
- Citation
- [2022] LSHC 90
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Accused: Rethabile Morabe
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2022
- Case Number
- CRI/T/0018/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial / Judgment
- Outcome
- Guilty of Culpable Homicide
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Culpable Homicide, Firearms Offences, Intoxication, Admissions and Confessions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Rethabile Morabe
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused unlawfully and intentionally killed the deceased
- 2 Admissibility of the accused's admission
- 3 Whether the accused had subjective intention to kill or acted negligently
Ratio Decidendi
The accused's admission was voluntary and admissible; his version was not credible as it was not put to Crown witnesses and was contradicted. The evidence did not prove subjective intention to kill but established negligence, amounting to culpable homicide.
Court Disposition
Guilty of Culpable Homicide
Orders
- Accused sentenced to 6 years imprisonment, 1 year suspended for 2 years
- The gun is forfeited to the state to be destroyed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment