Mokhitli v Motinyane (CIV/APN/106/2021) [2022] LSHC 232 (29 September 2022)
Applicants failed to establish any justifiable grounds for the court to nullify the elections; the issues raised are purely political and should be resolved internally by the party. No illegality, irrationality, or unfairness was proven.
- Citation
- [2022] LSHC 232
- Parties
- Applicant: Silase Mokhitli; Applicant: Semonko Lesenyo; Applicant: Mako Chobokoane; Applicant: Khoale Thebe; Applicant: Thabo Nkeshi; Applicant: Mathabo Mokalanyane; Respondent: Motinyane Motinyane; Respondent: Matsekiso Motinyane; Respondent: Matokelo Morie; Respondent: Mphonyane Kekana; Respondent: Nondabezithe Babeli; Respondent: Lelimo Monese; Respondent: National Executive Committee of All Basotho Convention; Respondent: All Basotho Convention; Respondent: Montoeli Masoetsa; Respondent: Maseeng Maputsoe
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2022
- Case Number
- CIV/APN/106/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Internal Party Disputes, Judicial Review, Political Party Elections, Costs for Non Disclosure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Silase Mokhitli
Applicant
Semonko Lesenyo
Applicant
Mako Chobokoane
Applicant
Khoale Thebe
Applicant
Thabo Nkeshi
Applicant
Mathabo Mokalanyane
Applicant
Motinyane Motinyane
Respondent
Matsekiso Motinyane
Respondent
Matokelo Morie
Respondent
Mphonyane Kekana
Respondent
Nondabezithe Babeli
Respondent
Lelimo Monese
Respondent
National Executive Committee of All Basotho Convention
Respondent
All Basotho Convention
Respondent
Montoeli Masoetsa
Respondent
Maseeng Maputsoe
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants established grounds for review of the Thetsane Constituency Committee elections of 2nd July 2022 as irregular and null and void ab initio
- 2 Whether the court should intervene in internal political party disputes
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants failed to establish any justifiable grounds for the court to nullify the elections; the issues raised are purely political and should be resolved internally by the party. No illegality, irrationality, or unfairness was proven.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs to be borne by 2nd, 4th and 5th applicants jointly and severally.
- 1st, 3rd and 6th applicants to bear costs associated with their withdrawal jointly and severally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment