SOLANDRA INC. (In Liquidation) V VASANT (CCA/0101/2022) [2023] LSHC 138 (14 September 2023)
The application for rescission by Solandra Inc. (In Liquidation) was fatally defective due to lack of locus standi, as the foreign liquidator had not been recognised by the court. However, the court, mero motu, found that the orders of 19 October 2022 were erroneously granted in the absence of an interested party and thus rescinded them under Rule 45(1).
- Citation
- [2023] LSHC 138
- Parties
- Applicant: Solandra Inc. (In Liquidation); 1st Respondent: Dalvi Madhav Vasant; 2nd Respondent: CGM Industrial (Pty) Ltd; 3rd Respondent: Presitex Enterprises (Pty) Ltd; 4th Respondent: Ministry of Trade & Industry; 5th Respondent: Registrar of Companies; 6th Respondent: Attorney General
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2023
- Case Number
- CCA/0101/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Rescission of Judgment / Judgment on Rescission Application
- Outcome
- orders of 19 October 2022 rescinded; Solandra Inc. (In Liquidation) joined as respondent; all acts pursuant to rescinded orders declared null and void; each party to bear its own costs
- Legal Topics
- Rescission of Judgment, Locus Standi of Foreign Liquidator, Recognition of Foreign Representatives, Joinder of Parties
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Solandra Inc. (In Liquidation)
Applicant
Dalvi Madhav Vasant
1st Respondent
CGM Industrial (Pty) Ltd
2nd Respondent
Presitex Enterprises (Pty) Ltd
3rd Respondent
Ministry of Trade & Industry
4th Respondent
Registrar of Companies
5th Respondent
Attorney General
6th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Rescission of Judgment / Judgment on Rescission Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a foreign liquidator must be recognised by the court before instituting proceedings in Lesotho
- 2 Whether the orders of 19 October 2022 were erroneously granted in the absence of an interested party
- 3 Whether the application for rescission should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The application for rescission by Solandra Inc. (In Liquidation) was fatally defective due to lack of locus standi, as the foreign liquidator had not been recognised by the court. However, the court, mero motu, found that the orders of 19 October 2022 were erroneously granted in the absence of an interested party and thus rescinded them under Rule 45(1).
Court Disposition
orders of 19 October 2022 rescinded; Solandra Inc. (In Liquidation) joined as respondent; all acts pursuant to rescinded orders declared null and void; each party to bear its own costs
Orders
- The orders of this court issued on the 19 October 2022 in CCA/0101/2022 are rescinded.
- Solandra Inc. (In Liquidation) is joined as the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment