Specified Offices Defined Contribution Fund v Ts'ehlana (CIV/APN 100 of 14) [2014] LSHC 44 (14 August 2014)
The court held that, applying the literal rule of interpretation, the statutes permit a retiree to terminate membership to the pension fund and, upon doing so, to receive the outstanding balance of their fund credit, including the remaining 75%. There is no statutory prohibition against such payment to retirees, and the applicants' interpretation was rejected.
- Citation
- [2014] LSHC 44
- Parties
- Applicant: Specified Offices Defined Contribution Fund; Applicant: Public Officers Defined Contribution Pension Fund; Respondent: Lehlohonolo Tsehlana
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 2014
- Case Number
- CIV/APN 100 of 14
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Motion (ex Parte Notice of Motion) / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaratory orders sought by the applicants refused.
- Legal Topics
- Defined Contribution Pension Funds, Retirement Benefits, Membership Termination, Lump Sum Payments, Annuities
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Specified Offices Defined Contribution Fund
Applicant
Public Officers Defined Contribution Pension Fund
Applicant
Lehlohonolo Tsehlana
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Motion (ex Parte Notice of Motion) / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a retiree who terminates membership to the pension fund is entitled to receive the remaining 75% of their fund credit as a lump sum under S. 6 and S. 31 of the Specified Offices Defined Contributions Pensions Fund Act No. 19 of 2011 and S. 5 and S. 27 of the Public Officers Defined Contribution Pension Fund Act No. 57 of 2008.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, applying the literal rule of interpretation, the statutes permit a retiree to terminate membership to the pension fund and, upon doing so, to receive the outstanding balance of their fund credit, including the remaining 75%. There is no statutory prohibition against such payment to retirees, and the applicants' interpretation was rejected.
Court Disposition
Declaratory orders sought by the applicants refused.
Orders
- Declaration sought by the 1st Applicant refused.
- Declaration sought by the 2nd Applicant refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment