Standard Lesotho Bank Limited v Kopano Holdings (Pty) Ltd (CCT/0039/2017) [2021] LSHC 18 (8 November 2021)

Standard Lesotho Bank Limited v Kopano Holdings (Pty) Ltd (CCT/0039/2017) [2021] LSHC 18 (8 November 2021)

The court held that the defendant, having contractually agreed to pay attorney and client costs in the Suretyship Agreement, is bound by that agreement in the absence of any proven misconduct or unreasonable conduct by the plaintiff. The defendant failed to provide sufficient grounds or evidence to justify a departure from the agreed costs, and the court's discretion did not extend to disregarding the contract without such grounds.

Citation
[2021] LSHC 18
Parties
Plaintiff: Standard Lesotho Bank Limited; Defendant: Kopano Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Judgment Date
8 November 2021 8 November 2021 25 March 2021
Case Number
CCT/0039/2017
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial) / Judgment on Costs Following Settlement of Main Claim
Outcome
Defendant ordered to pay plaintiff's costs on attorney and client scale.
Legal Topics
Costs (attorney and Client Scale), Suretyship Agreement, Settlement of Claims, Court Discretion on Costs
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Contract Law Banking Law Costs (attorney and Client Scale) Suretyship Agreement Settlement of Claims Court Discretion on Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Standard Lesotho Bank Limited

Plaintiff

Kopano Holdings (Pty) Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (commercial) / Judgment on Costs Following Settlement of Main Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to costs on attorney and client scale after settlement of the main claim
  2. 2 Whether the court is bound to enforce a contractual agreement on costs absent misconduct by the successful party

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the defendant, having contractually agreed to pay attorney and client costs in the Suretyship Agreement, is bound by that agreement in the absence of any proven misconduct or unreasonable conduct by the plaintiff. The defendant failed to provide sufficient grounds or evidence to justify a departure from the agreed costs, and the court's discretion did not extend to disregarding the contract without such grounds.

Court Disposition

Defendant ordered to pay plaintiff's costs on attorney and client scale.

Orders

  • The defendant is ordered to pay plaintiff’s costs on attorney and client scale.