R v Poosa (CRI/A 93 of 90) [1994] LSCA 48 (11 March 1994)
The appellant did not possess the subjective intent to kill required for attempted murder; however, his actions met the objective standard for assault common, as he intentionally pointed and fired a rifle in a manner likely to cause fear or harm.
- Citation
- [1994] LSCA 48
- Parties
- Appellant: Tankiso Possa; Respondent: Rex
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 1994
- Case Number
- CRI/A 93 of 90
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed in part; conviction for attempted murder quashed and substituted with assault common; sentence reinstated.
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Murder, Assault Common, Mens Rea, Intention, Objective Vs Subjective Test
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tankiso Possa
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had the requisite mens rea for attempted murder
- 2 Whether the conviction for attempted murder was proper
- 3 Whether the appellant was guilty of assault common
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not possess the subjective intent to kill required for attempted murder; however, his actions met the objective standard for assault common, as he intentionally pointed and fired a rifle in a manner likely to cause fear or harm.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed in part; conviction for attempted murder quashed and substituted with assault common; sentence reinstated.
Orders
- Verdict of attempted murder quashed and substituted with assault common.
- Sentence of M100.00 or 6 months' imprisonment, half suspended for three years on condition of no further violent offence, reinstated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment