Qathatsi v The Commissioner General LRA (C of A (CIV) 6 of 2021) [2021] LSCA 5 (14 May 2021)
The appeal was struck off the roll because the appellant failed to file the required certificate of leave to appeal from the High Court, and it would be unfair to award costs against the appellant as he was not responsible for the procedural default.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] LSCA 5
- Parties
- Appellant: Thabang Qathatsi; 1st Respondent: The Commissioner General, LRA; 2nd Respondent: The Lesotho Revenue Authority; 3rd Respondent: The Registrar of the High Court, Commercial Division
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Case Number
- C of A (CIV) 6 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Struck Off the Roll for Procedural Non Compliance
- Outcome
- appeal struck off the roll
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Leave to Appeal, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thabang Qathatsi
Appellant
The Commissioner General, LRA
1st Respondent
The Lesotho Revenue Authority
2nd Respondent
The Registrar of the High Court, Commercial Division
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Struck Off the Roll for Procedural Non Compliance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal could proceed without the required certificate of leave to appeal from the High Court
- 2 Whether costs should be awarded given the circumstances of the procedural default
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was struck off the roll because the appellant failed to file the required certificate of leave to appeal from the High Court, and it would be unfair to award costs against the appellant as he was not responsible for the procedural default.
Court Disposition
appeal struck off the roll
Orders
- The appeal is struck off the roll.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF LESOTHO HELD AT MASERU C OF A (CIV) NO. 06/2021 CCA/A/0001/2017 RAT/01/2016/17 C OF A (CIV) NO. 57/2015 In the matter between - THABANG QATHATSI APPELLANT AND THE COMMISSIONER GENERAL, LRA 1ST RESPONDENT THE LESOTHO REVENUE AUTHORITY 2ND RESPONDENT THE REGISTRAR OF THE HIGH COURT, COMMERCIAL DIVISION 3RD RESPONDENT CORAM: DR K E MOSITO P P T DAMASEB AJA DR J VAN DER WESTHUIZEN AJA HEARD: 23 APRIL 2021 DELIVERED: 14 MAY 2021 SUMMARY Appellant representing himself; appeal struck off the roll because of failure to file certificate of leave to appeal; no costs order. VAN DER WESTHUIZEN AJA RULING [1] This appeal has a long history. What is relevant here though, is that on Friday 16 April 2021, before this Court, the legal representative of Mr Thabang Quathatsi, the appellant, withdrew. The appellant elected to represent himself. The matter was postponed, inter alia because of the late filing of parts of the record. [2] On Friday 23 April 2021, before this court, counsel for the respondent pointed out that the required certificate from the High Court, granting leave to appeal, had not been obtained and filed. He asked for the matter to be struck off the roll of this Court. After some explanation, the appellant accepted that this was the situation and that the appeal could not proceed. He undertook to work on obtaining the required certificate without delay. The appeal had to be struck off. [3] The issue of costs before this Court was debated and the decision of this Court reserved. Given the fact that the Appellant himself was not responsible for the failure to submit the certificate and the delay in the filing of the record, it would not be fair to mulct him in costs. There is also no reason to order costs against the respondent. Order [4] The following is thus ordered: (a) The appeal is struck off the roll. (b) There is no order as to costs. _______________________________ DR J VAN DER WESTHUIZEN ACTING JUSTICE OF APPEAL __________________________ DR K E MOSITO PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL I agree I agree ___________________________________ PT DAMASEB ACTING JUSTICE OF APPEAL FOR APPELLANT: ADV. N HLALELE (Later Appellant in person) FOR RESPONDENT: ADV. R A NTEMA 4