Ramokoena v Standard Chartered Bank (LC 116 of 96) [1997] LSLC 14 (23 July 1997)

The procedure adopted by the Managing Director in conducting the appeal did not violate the rules of natural justice and was not procedurally unfair to the applicant.

Citation: [1997] LSLC 14
Parties: Applicant: Thabiso Ramokoena; Respondent: Standard Chartered Bank
Court: Labour Court
Jurisdiction: Lesotho
Judgment Date: 23 July 1997
Case Number: LC 116 of 96
Procedural Posture: Labour Dispute / Judgment
Outcome: application dismissed
Legal Topics: Disciplinary Procedure, Natural Justice, Appeal Process
Source Language: English

Employment Law Disciplinary Procedure Natural Justice Appeal Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Thabiso Ramokoena

Applicant

Standard Chartered Bank

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Dispute / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the disciplinary appeal procedure was procedurally irregular and violated rules of natural justice

Ratio Decidendi

The procedure adopted by the Managing Director in conducting the appeal did not violate the rules of natural justice and was not procedurally unfair to the applicant.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

costs to be costs in the suit