Mohlobo and Others v Lesotho Highlands Development Authority (LAC/CIV/A 2 of 2010) [2011] LSLAC 2 (26 January 2011)
The arbitrator committed a material error of law by failing to consider the Human Resource Manual and the issue of breach of contract, instead determining the validity of the contract, which was not the dispute referred. This error materially affected the decision, making the award reviewable and subject to being set aside. The Labour Court erred in refusing to review the DDPR award on this basis.
- Citation
- [2011] LSLAC 2
- Parties
- Appellant: Thabo Mohlobo; Appellant: Thabiso Segoatsi; Appellant: Mentsele Molato; Appellant: Isaac Sepetla; Appellant: Lebonajoang Rantho; Appellant: Seboka Pule; Appellant: Ramoreboli Chabeli; Appellant: Sephula Letuka; Appellant: Ntimo Nkome; Appellant: Joseph Koabatsana; Appellant: Motsomi Ralitapole; Appellant: Moeketsi Jaase; Appellant: Jobo Lerotholi; Appellant: Pheello Ratsoanyane; Respondent: Lesotho Highlands Development Authority
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2011
- Case Number
- LAC/CIV/A 2 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Decision
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Review of Arbitral Awards, Breach of Contract, Employment Benefits, Jurisdiction of Arbitrator, Material Error of Law
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thabo Mohlobo
Appellant
Thabiso Segoatsi
Appellant
Mentsele Molato
Appellant
Isaac Sepetla
Appellant
Lebonajoang Rantho
Appellant
Seboka Pule
Appellant
Ramoreboli Chabeli
Appellant
Sephula Letuka
Appellant
Ntimo Nkome
Appellant
Joseph Koabatsana
Appellant
Motsomi Ralitapole
Appellant
Moeketsi Jaase
Appellant
Jobo Lerotholi
Appellant
Pheello Ratsoanyane
Appellant
Lesotho Highlands Development Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator committed a material error of law by failing to consider the Human Resource Manual and the issue of breach of contract
- 2 Whether the Labour Court erred in refusing to review the DDPR award on the basis of a material error of law
- 3 Whether the DDPR exceeded its jurisdiction by determining validity rather than breach of contract
Ratio Decidendi
The arbitrator committed a material error of law by failing to consider the Human Resource Manual and the issue of breach of contract, instead determining the validity of the contract, which was not the dispute referred. This error materially affected the decision, making the award reviewable and subject to being set aside. The Labour Court erred in refusing to review the DDPR award on this basis.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal succeeds and the order of the Labour Court is altered to read 'the award of the DDPR is reviewed and set aside'.
- The case is remitted to the DDPR for hearing de novo before a different arbitrator.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment