Thelingoane v Moradi Crushers (Pty) Ltd (LC 24 of 97) [2002] LSLC 25 (11 December 2002)
The applicant failed to establish any procedural irregularity as there was no rule entitling him to cross-examination, personal prosecution of appeal, or representation beyond what was accorded. The disciplinary record contradicted his claims, and no substantive challenge to the dismissal was raised.
- Citation
- [2002] LSLC 25
- Parties
- Applicant: Thabo Thelingoane; Respondent: Moradi Crushers (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2002
- Case Number
- LC 24 of 97
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Dispute / Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Disciplinary Procedure, Right to Representation, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thabo Thelingoane
Applicant
Moradi Crushers (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Dispute / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was denied a fair hearing during the disciplinary process
- 2 Whether the applicant was denied the right to cross-examine witnesses
- 3 Whether the applicant was denied the right to representation by a union steward
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to establish any procedural irregularity as there was no rule entitling him to cross-examination, personal prosecution of appeal, or representation beyond what was accorded. The disciplinary record contradicted his claims, and no substantive challenge to the dismissal was raised.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- no order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment