Rasekila v Telecom Lesotho (Pty) Ltd and Others (LAC/A 1 of 2013) [2015] LSLAC 4 (8 September 2015)

Rasekila v Telecom Lesotho (Pty) Ltd and Others (LAC/A 1 of 2013) [2015] LSLAC 4 (8 September 2015)

The Labour Court order was void ab initio as it was not consequent of a proper hearing; the matter must be heard afresh.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] LSLAC 4
Parties
Appellant: Thamahane Rasekila; 1st Respondent: Telecom Lesotho (Pty) Ltd; 2nd Respondent: President of the Labour Court; 3rd Respondent: DDPR (Arbitrator Keta)
Court
Labour Appeal Court
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Case Number
LAC/A 1 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Labour Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal partly succeeds
Legal Topics
Review of Court Order, Procedural Fairness
Source Language
en
Labour Law Review of Court Order Procedural Fairness

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thamahane Rasekila

Appellant

Telecom Lesotho (Pty) Ltd

1st Respondent

President of the Labour Court

2nd Respondent

DDPR (Arbitrator Keta)

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Labour Court order dated 27/09/2011 was valid given lack of formal hearing

Ratio Decidendi

The Labour Court order was void ab initio as it was not consequent of a proper hearing; the matter must be heard afresh.

Court Disposition

appeal partly succeeds

Orders

  • Labour Court order dated 27/09/2011 set aside
  • Matter remitted to Labour Court to be heard afresh