Lehloenya v R (CRI/A 28 of 99) [2000] LSCA 28 (8 February 2000)
The appellant was the aggressor and not under unlawful attack; his version was not reasonably true and was contradicted by direct evidence. The trial magistrate did not misdirect herself, and the convictions were justified. Sentences were not harsh given the circumstances, but should run concurrently as offences occurred at the same time and place.
- Citation
- [2000] LSCA 28
- Parties
- Appellant: Tholang Lehloenya; Respondent: Rex
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Judgment Date
- 8 February 2000
- Case Number
- CRI/A 28 of 99
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; convictions and sentences confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Murder, Assault With Intent to Cause Grievous Bodily Harm, Self Defence, Sentencing
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tholang Lehloenya
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had the necessary intent for attempted murder and assault with intent to cause grievous bodily harm
- 2 Whether the appellant acted in self-defence
- 3 Whether the trial magistrate misdirected herself in evaluating the evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was the aggressor and not under unlawful attack; his version was not reasonably true and was contradicted by direct evidence. The trial magistrate did not misdirect herself, and the convictions were justified. Sentences were not harsh given the circumstances, but should run concurrently as offences occurred at the same time and place.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; convictions and sentences confirmed
Orders
- Sentences on the three counts to run concurrently
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment