R v Mokheche (CRI/A 6 of 80) [1980] LSHC 36 (19 May 1980)

R v Mokheche (CRI/A 6 of 80) [1980] LSHC 36 (19 May 1980)

The appellant's conviction was supported by overwhelming evidence, and his explanation was palpably false. However, the sentence of imprisonment was inappropriate given his status as a first offender and the circumstances, and should be substituted with a fine.

Citation
[1980] LSHC 36
Parties
Appellant: Thomas Mokheche; Respondent: Rex
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Judgment Date
19 May 1980
Case Number
CRI/A 6 of 80
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment After Appeal Hearing
Outcome
appeal dismissed as to conviction; sentence varied
Legal Topics
Theft, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Theft Sentencing Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Mokheche

Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment After Appeal Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for theft was supported by the evidence
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed was excessive or harsh

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's conviction was supported by overwhelming evidence, and his explanation was palpably false. However, the sentence of imprisonment was inappropriate given his status as a first offender and the circumstances, and should be substituted with a fine.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed as to conviction; sentence varied

Orders

  • Sentence of nine months imprisonment set aside and substituted with a fine of M90.00 or nine months imprisonment in default.
  • Fine to be paid as follows: M20.00 at the end of May 1980; M20.00 at the end of June 1980; surrender of cash bail bond (M50.00) to Registrar.