Lelala v Basotho National Party and Others (CIV/APN 156 of 98) [1998] LSCA 39 (6 May 1998)
The court determined that the errors in the primary elections must be rectified by holding new constituency elections in strict compliance with Legal Notice No 38 of 1998 and the relevant constitutional provisions, ensuring universal suffrage and secret ballot.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] LSCA 39
- Parties
- Applicant: Tsolo Lelala; 1st Respondent: Basotho National Party; 2nd Respondent: Retselisitsoe Sekhonyana; 3rd Respondent: Leseteli Malefane
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Lesotho
- Case Number
- CIV/APN 156 of 98
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Rule nisi discharged; application disposed with orders for new elections.
- Legal Topics
- Nomination of Candidates, Primary Elections, Electoral Process, Party Constitution Compliance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tsolo Lelala
Applicant
Basotho National Party
1st Respondent
Retselisitsoe Sekhonyana
2nd Respondent
Leseteli Malefane
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the primary elections for BNP nomination at HA MAA MA constituency were conducted properly
- 2 How to rectify errors in the nomination process
- 3 Compliance with constitutional and party requirements for elections
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that the errors in the primary elections must be rectified by holding new constituency elections in strict compliance with Legal Notice No 38 of 1998 and the relevant constitutional provisions, ensuring universal suffrage and secret ballot.
Court Disposition
Rule nisi discharged; application disposed with orders for new elections.
Orders
- Constituency Committee of HA MAA MA to arrange new elections within seven days in compliance with Legal Notice No 38 of 1998.
- 3rd respondent recused from committee preparations for new elections.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
CIV/APN/156/98 IN T HE H I GH C O U RT OF L E S O T HO In the matter between:- T S O LO L E L A LA A P P L I C A NT and B A S O T HO N A T I O N AL P A R TY R E T S E L I S I T S OE S E K H O N Y A NA L E S E T E LI M A L E F A NE 1 ST R E S P O N D E NT 2 ND R E S P O N D E NT 3 RD R E S P O N D E NT J U D G M E NT D e l i v e r ed by the H o n o u r a b le M r s. Justice K. J. G u ni on the 0 6 th d ay of M a y, 1 9 98 T h e re is a dispute regarding the elections for B MP N o m i n a t i on for c a n d i d a cy to stand for the c o m i ng general elections at HA M A A MA constituency. It a p p e a rs only t wo candidates entered the race in that p r i m a ry elections. T he applicant herein is o ne of the contestants in the said primarily elections. He describes h i m s e lf in his F o u n d i ng Affidavit as a m e m b er of the B NP M A A MA C o n s t i t u e n cy N o . 4 0. He is also a m e m b er of t wo other C o m m i t t e es of B NP i.e the E x e c u t i ve C o m m i t t ee a nd (the W o r k i ng C o m m i t t e e. 2 T he other contestant in the p r i m a ry elections h e ld at HA M A A MA C o n s t i t u e n cy is the 3 rd respondent herein. He is d e s c r i b ed in the applicant's F o u n d i ng Affidavit as the m e m b er of B NP M A A MA C o n s t i t u e n c y. A p p l i c a nt a nd 3 rd r e s p o n d e nt w i sh a nd are desirous to be elected a nd /or n o m i n a t ed to stand as BNP c a n d i d a t es at HA M A A MA C o n s t i t u e n cy in this c o m i ng general elections. T h e re are quite a n u m b er of facts w h i ch are in the c o m m on c a u se in this present applicant. 1. It is established that on 5/04/98 a nd 14/4/98 the elections for n o m i n a t i on to stand as a B NP candidate in this c o m i ng general election at HA M A A MA constituency w e re held. 2. It is also established that in the c o n d u ct of the said elections, on the 5th a nd 14th A p r i l ' 98 there w e re s o me errors w h i ch w e re c o m m i t t e d. A t t e m p ts w e re m a de to rectify s o me of t h em t h o u gh n ot successfully. T h e re is therefore a n e ed to finally rectify those m i s t a k e s. 3. T h o se m i s t a k es m u st be rectified w h e re they o c c u r r ed by the p e o p le w ho are m o st c o n c e r n ed a nd h a ve a right to do so. T he p r o p o s ed m a n n er by either party for rectification of t h o se errors differ significantly. T he court h as d e c i d ed to f o l l ow its o wn route different f r om a ny route s u g g e s t ed by e a ch party in their prayers. Y ou m ay w o n d er a little w hy a nd h ow c an the court give y ou w h at y ou h a ve n ot specifically a s k ed for in y o ur p r a y e r s. L et me hasten to a dd that T he a n s w er will be f o u nd in fact in y o ur p r a y e r s. E v e ry litigant r e c o g n i s es t he p o w er a nd authority of t he court to d e c i de as it thinks fit. E v e ry litigant c o n c l u d es his or h er p r a y e rs by a s k i ng the c o u rt to grant further a n d / or alternative relief as it s e es fit. It is in the light of t h o se p r a y e rs a nd the c i r c u m s t a n c es of this c a se that w h en this application w as initially p l a c ed b e f o re H o n o u r a b le Mr Justice S P E E TE AJ he forth w i th i s s u ed o ut the rule in the f o l l o w i ng t e r m s :- T h at the I N D E P E N D E NT E L E C T O R AL C O M M I S S I ON is h e r e by interdicted f r om filing in a n o m i n a t i on for the M A A MA C O N S T I T U E N CY relating to the parties herein p e n d i ng finalisation h e r e of 2. T he matter is p o s t p o n ed to the 2 9 th d ay of April, 1 9 9 8. 3. Applicant is authorised to file s u ch further s u p p l e m e n t a ry affidavits by the 21st d ay of April, 1 9 98 as m ay be necessary. 4. R e s p o n d e n ts are permitted to file s u ch o p p o s i ng affidavits as m ay be necessary by Friday the 24th April, 1 9 9 8. T he parties h a ve filed as o r d e r ed the appropriate p a p e r s. T h o se p a p e rs h a ve b e en thoroughly p e r u s e d. T he m a t t er w as h e a rd on 2 9 / 4 / 98 as o r d e r e d. T he a r g u m e n ts m a de on 2 9 / 4 / 98 by the c o u n s el for applicant a nd r e s p o n d e n ts h a ve b e en m o st eloquent a nd helpful. T he time is n ot on o ur side. T he n u m b er of d a ys within w h i ch the n o m i n a t i o n s, of candidates for 1 9 98 general elections s h o u ld be m a d e, is steadily diminishing. I h a ve therefore f o u nd it expedient to allow the p e o p le of HA M A A MA C o n s t i t u e n cy w ho are the final a nd ultimate authority as regards the d e t e r m i n a t i on of w ho s h o u ld represent t h em to exercise their right w h i ch e n a b l es t h em to participate in g o v e r n m e n t. T he S u p r e me L aw of the land " 1 9 93 constitution of L e s o t h o" so d e m a n ds by enshrining e v e ry citizen's right to v o te his or h er representative to parliament. T he R u le N I SI issued out by H o n o u r a b le Mr Justice S P E E TE AJ on 18th April 1 9 98 is finally d i s c h a r g ed a nd the following o r d er is m a de as a final o r d er in this matter.. It is ordered that:- 1. T he C o n s t i t u e n cy C o m m i t t ee of HA M A A MA is directed to a r r a n ge for n ew constituency elections of candidates following to the letter a nd spirit the provisions of Legal Notice N o 38 of 1 9 98 m o re particularly constituency b o u n d a r i es as s h o wn in that notice. 2. T h o se p r i m a ry elections m u st be held within s e v en d a ys f r om the date of this order. 3. T he 3 rd respondent is recused f r om his m e m b e r s h ip of the constituency c o m m i t t ee of HA M A A M A, only in the preparations for that constituency's p r i m a ry elections w h i ch are to be held following this court order for the n o m i n a t i on of the candidate to represent B NP at this c o m i ng general elections.. 4. A p p l i c a nt a nd 3rd r e s p o n d e nt should contest the said p r i m a ry elections in that constituency of HA M A A M A, on the date w h i ch m u st o c c ur within s e v en d a ys of this order. T h at date of Constituency elections to be held following this order m u st be a n n o u n c ed by the election officer appointed to c o n d u ct s u ch elections. T h at a n n o u n c e m e nt m u st be m a de at least t wo d a ys before the said constituency elections take place. 5. T he electors should satisfy the election officers that they qualify to v o te in that HA M A A MA constituency in this c o m i ng general elections. T he contestants of the said elections or their agents m u st also be so satisfied that those taking part in that election are p e o p le w ho are entitled to vote in that particular constituency. 6. T he Executives C o m m i t t ee of 1st r e s p o n d e nt ( B N P) is directed by this order to appoint i m m e d i a t e ly at least w i t h in 48 h o u rs of this o r d er a p e r s on or t wo p e r s o ns w ho in its opinion are of h i gh calibre a nd integrity to c o n d u ct the said c o n s t i t u e n cy p r i m a ry elections. 7. T he s e c o nd r e s p o n d e nt is o r d e r ed to f o r go a ny p o w e rs w h i ch he m i g ht h a ve as a leader of B NP in t e r ms of B NP Constitution, to v a ry or v e to the o u t c o me of the aforesaid elections. 8. T he constituency elections to be h e ld m u st be c o n d u c t ed by secret ballot. T he voters m u st n ot be subjected to the voting m a n n er that e x p o s es t h em to intimidation a nd other electoral m a l p r a c t i c es s u ch as lining b e h i nd the c a n d i d a te of y o ur c h o i ce or s h o w i ng by h a nd or a ny gesture that a v o t er h as or i n t e n ds to v o te of a ny particular candidate. In all respects the c o n d u ct of the elections as o r d e r ed by this court m u st be in a c c o r d a n ce w i th the constitution of B NP in so far as it is consistent w i th the 1 9 93 L e s o t ho constitution. In t e r ms of section 2 0 ( l ) ( b) constitution of L e s o t ho 1 9 9 3, " E v e ry citizen shall e n j oy t he right to v o te or s t a nd for election at periodic elections u n d er this constitution a nd u n d er the s y s t em of universal suffrage a nd secret ballot." 9. T he s e c o nd r e s p o n d e nt s h o u ld forthwith or at least w i t h in 48 h o u rs of receipt by h im of the election results, f o r w a rd the n a me of the d u ly elected c a n d i d a te to the I n d e p e n d e nt Electoral C o m m i s s i o n. 1 0. I n d e p e n d e nt Electoral C o m m i s s i on is h e r e by o r d e r ed to register forthwith s u ch candidate as duly n o m i n a t ed by First r e s p o n d e nt and/or on its behalf a nd publish s u ch n o m i n a t i on accordingly. 11. E a ch party m u st bear its o wn costs. K . J . G U NI J U D GE M a y, 1 9 98 F or the Applicant: Mr M o s i to a nd M e t l ae F or the C r o w n: Mr Ntlhoki