CESCON ENGINEERS SDN. BHD. PESAT BUMI SDN. BHD.
The setting aside application succeeds: the adjudicator relied on undisclosed SSM company search results and drew an adverse "not at arm's length" inference about related shareholders/directors which materially affected his findings (notably reinstatement of sums in VO7) without showing the search results or affording the parties an opportunity to comment; that material breach of natural justice required setting aside the adjudication decision and consequently dismissal of the enforcement application.
- Citation
- WA-24C-163-07/2020 & WA-24C-176-08/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff in WA 24 C 163 07/2020; Defendant in WA 24 C 176 08/2020: Cescon Engineers Sdn. Bhd.; Defendant in WA 24 C 163 07/2020; Plaintiff in WA 24 C 176 08/2020: Pesat Bumi Sdn. Bhd.
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 24 December 2020
- Case Number
- WA-24C-163-07/2020 & WA-24C-176-08/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons Proceedings Under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (cipaa) / Hearing of Concurrent Applications to Enforce, Set Aside and Stay an Adjudication Decision; High Court Judgment Delivered
- Outcome
- Setting Aside Application allowed; Enforcement Application dismissed; Stay Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Under CIPAA, Setting Aside Adjudication Decision (s 15), Natural Justice (audi Alteram Partem), Enforcement of Adjudication Decision (s 28), Adjudicator Impartiality and Disclosure, Stay of Adjudication Decision (s 16)
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cescon Engineers Sdn. Bhd.
Plaintiff in WA 24 C 163 07/2020; Defendant in WA 24 C 176 08/2020
Pesat Bumi Sdn. Bhd.
Defendant in WA 24 C 163 07/2020; Plaintiff in WA 24 C 176 08/2020
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons Proceedings Under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (cipaa) / Hearing of Concurrent Applications to Enforce, Set Aside and Stay an Adjudication Decision; High Court Judgment Delivered
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator breached the rules of natural justice by relying on undisclosed company search results and drawing adverse inferences without giving parties an opportunity to respond
- 2 Whether the adjudicator acted without independence or impartiality
- 3 Whether the adjudicator exceeded jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
The setting aside application succeeds: the adjudicator relied on undisclosed SSM company search results and drew an adverse "not at arm's length" inference about related shareholders/directors which materially affected his findings (notably reinstatement of sums in VO7) without showing the search results or affording the parties an opportunity to comment; that material breach of natural justice required setting aside the adjudication decision and consequently dismissal of the enforcement application.
Court Disposition
Setting Aside Application allowed; Enforcement Application dismissed; Stay Application dismissed
Orders
- Setting Aside Application (O.S. No. WA-24C-176-08/2020) allowed; adjudication decision set aside
- Enforcement Application (O.S. No. WA-24C-163-07/2020) dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment