1. ) Ong Hock An 2. ) Bernard Tan Chek Hean 1. ) XSPEC Resources Sdn Bhd 2. ) Dato' Sri Zul Azmi Bin Abu Hussin 3. ) Mohamad Safwan Bin Abdul Malek
The court held that the Debenture's express terms together with Companies Act 2016 ss 374, 375, 383, 388, 389 and 390 authorized MDV to appoint the Plaintiffs as receivers and managers and empowered the Plaintiffs to take possession of charged assets and to require production of books, records and a statement of affairs; the Defendants' refusal to comply was unjustified and the Originating Summons was therefore allowed with extensions for compliance and an award of costs.
- Citation
- WA-24NCC-861-08/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff (receiver and Manager Appointed): ONG HOCK AN; Plaintiff (receiver and Manager Appointed): BERNARD TAN CHEK HEAN; 1st Defendant (company): XSPEC RESOURCES SDN BHD; 2nd Defendant (director and Shareholder): DATO’ SRI ZUL AZMI BIN ABU HUSSIN; 3rd Defendant (company Secretary): MOHAMAD SAFWAN BIN ABDUL MALEK
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 27 December 2022
- Case Number
- WA-24NCC-861-08/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons (companies Act) / Judgment (final)
- Outcome
- Originating Summons allowed (with modifications)
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Receivers and Managers, Debenture Enforcement, Books and Records and Statement of Affairs, Possession and Control of Charged Assets, Statutory Powers Under Companies Act 2016
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ONG HOCK AN
Plaintiff (receiver and Manager Appointed)
BERNARD TAN CHEK HEAN
Plaintiff (receiver and Manager Appointed)
XSPEC RESOURCES SDN BHD
1st Defendant (company)
DATO’ SRI ZUL AZMI BIN ABU HUSSIN
2nd Defendant (director and Shareholder)
MOHAMAD SAFWAN BIN ABDUL MALEK
3rd Defendant (company Secretary)
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons (companies Act) / Judgment (final)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appointment of receivers and managers was valid under the Debenture and Companies Act 2016
- 2 Whether Plaintiffs are entitled to possession of charged assets and to production of books, records and statement of affairs
- 3 Whether Defendants may withhold compliance on grounds of lack of consent, alleged lack of charged assets, parallel litigation or alleged abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Debenture's express terms together with Companies Act 2016 ss 374, 375, 383, 388, 389 and 390 authorized MDV to appoint the Plaintiffs as receivers and managers and empowered the Plaintiffs to take possession of charged assets and to require production of books, records and a statement of affairs; the Defendants' refusal to comply was unjustified and the Originating Summons was therefore allowed with extensions for compliance and an award of costs.
Court Disposition
Originating Summons allowed (with modifications)
Orders
- Defendants to deliver and surrender possession of all books and records of 1st Defendant to the Plaintiffs as Receivers and Managers
- Defendants to provide statement of affairs of the 1st Defendant in accordance with Companies Act 2016 within extended time ordered by the Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment