PENDAKWARAYA FBL (Kanak-kanak)

PENDAKWARAYA FBL (Kanak-kanak)

Having found the child fit to stand trial and guilty on plea, the court balanced public interest against the childs welfare: taking into account the psychiatric diagnosis (depressive episode related to trauma), counselling reports showing improvement, first offender status, early plea, remorse and strong family support, the court concluded rehabilitation in the community with structured supervision best served both public interest and the childs welfare; therefore imposed a 3-year good behaviour bond on the child and a complementary parental surety with mandatory counselling and psychiatric follow-up rather than custody or placement in an approved school or Henry Gurney School.

Citation
JG-84-18-06/2021 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Parties
Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Child Defendant: FBL (Kanak-Kanak)
Court
Magistrates' Court
Jurisdiction
Malaysia
Judgment Date
26 October 2021
Case Number
JG-84-18-06/2021 (Mahkamah Majistret)
Procedural Posture
Criminal Attempted Murder (s.307 Penal Code) Involving a Child / Guilt Admitted; Sentencing/disposition in Childrens Court
Outcome
Child found guilty on plea under s.307 Penal Code; non-custodial rehabilitative order imposed under s.91(1)(b) Child Act 2001.
Legal Topics
Attempted Murder, Juvenile Sentencing, Probation/bond Orders, Fitness/psychiatric Report, Mitigation for Early Plea
Source Language
Malay/English
Criminal Law Juvenile/child Welfare Law Criminal Procedure Attempted Murder Juvenile Sentencing Probation/bond Orders Fitness/psychiatric Report Mitigation for Early Plea

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 28 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pendakwa Raya

Prosecution

FBL (Kanak-Kanak)

Child Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Attempted Murder (s.307 Penal Code) Involving a Child / Guilt Admitted; Sentencing/disposition in Childrens Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether child was fit to be tried and admit guilt following psychiatric report
  2. 2 Appropriate disposal under Child Act 2001 balancing public interest and childs welfare
  3. 3 Whether custodial order or non-custodial rehabilitative order (bond/probation/approved school) is appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

Having found the child fit to stand trial and guilty on plea, the court balanced public interest against the childs welfare: taking into account the psychiatric diagnosis (depressive episode related to trauma), counselling reports showing improvement, first offender status, early plea, remorse and strong family support, the court concluded rehabilitation in the community with structured supervision best served both public interest and the childs welfare; therefore imposed a 3-year good behaviour bond on the child and a complementary parental surety with mandatory counselling and psychiatric follow-up rather than custody or placement in an approved school or Henry Gurney School.

Court Disposition

Child found guilty on plea under s.307 Penal Code; non-custodial rehabilitative order imposed under s.91(1)(b) Child Act 2001.

Orders

  • PKK (the child) ordered to enter into a bond of good behaviour for 3 years with cagaran (security) RM1,000.00 under s.91(1)(b) Child Act 2001.
  • Parent/guardian ordered to enter into a bond for 3 years with cagaran (security) RM500.00 under s.93(1)(a) Child Act 2001 on conditions: (a) parent/guardian to accompany the child to monthly counselling sessions at Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat; and (b) parent/guardian to bring and accompany the child for psychiatric...