PENDAKWARAYA Pn. Nur Aina binti Ridzwan, En. Rajdeep A/L Bhupinder Singh, Pn. Maryam Jamielah binti Manaff & Pn. Rohaiza binti Abd Rahman (Jabatan Peguam Negara) En. Harpal Singh A/L Tara Singh (Tetuan T. Harpal & Associates)
Section 13(1) SOSMA bars bail for security offences and the only exceptions are the three specified categories in s13(2) (persons under 18, women, sick or infirm) subject to the proviso excluding offences under Chapter VIA Penal Code and Act 770; Section 388 CPC is displaced by the specific SOSMA provision; the term 'woman' is not read to include men; the applicant's medical condition (GERD and related complaints) does not amount to 'sick or infirm' within s13(2)(c) to justify bail; accordingly the bail application is dismissed.
- Citation
- WA-44-205-09/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Applicant/accused: Mohamad Faisal bin Mohamad Sharif; Respondent/public Prosecutor: Pendakwa Raya
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 9 December 2021
- Case Number
- WA-44-205-09/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Bail Application Under SOSMA and Penal Code S130 V(1) / High Court Bail Application on Appeal From Sessions Court After Denial of Bail
- Outcome
- Application for bail dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Security Offences (special Measures) Act 2012 (sosma) S13, Section 388 Criminal Procedure Code, Membership of Organised Criminal Group (s130 V Penal Code), Equality Under Article 8 Federal Constitution, Medical Grounds for Bail
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohamad Faisal bin Mohamad Sharif
Applicant/accused
Pendakwa Raya
Respondent/public Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal Bail Application Under SOSMA and Penal Code S130 V(1) / High Court Bail Application on Appeal From Sessions Court After Denial of Bail
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant entitled to bail under s13(2) SOSMA
- 2 Whether Court may grant bail under s388 CPC notwithstanding SOSMA
- 3 Whether the word 'woman' in s13(2)(b) SOSMA includes men
Ratio Decidendi
Section 13(1) SOSMA bars bail for security offences and the only exceptions are the three specified categories in s13(2) (persons under 18, women, sick or infirm) subject to the proviso excluding offences under Chapter VIA Penal Code and Act 770; Section 388 CPC is displaced by the specific SOSMA provision; the term 'woman' is not read to include men; the applicant's medical condition (GERD and related complaints) does not amount to 'sick or infirm' within s13(2)(c) to justify bail; accordingly the bail application is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for bail dismissed
Orders
- Application for bail dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment