[Timbalan (TPR), Jabatan Peguam Negara] MOHD FAIZ BIN ISMAIL
Court granted bail because s388 CPC permits release in non-bailable cases and the Federal Court authority in Koh Chin Wah supports bail for s26A offences; no cogent evidence of flight risk or witness tampering (migrants deported and depositions recorded); bail of RM20,000 with two sureties per accused and conditions (surrender travel documents, monthly police reporting) is just, reasonable, proportionate and not excessive given seriousness of offence; SOSMA objection noted but conflicting apex authority and fundamental liberty led to adopting the interpretation favouring bail.
- Citation
- WA-45SOM-2-01/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Public Prosecutor; Accused: Muhamad Azmi bin Yusuf
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2024
- Case Number
- WA-45SOM-2-01/2023 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Case Management and Bail Application
- Outcome
- Bail granted
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Human Smuggling, Anti Trafficking in Persons and Anti Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007 Section 26 a, Security Offences (sosma) Section 13, Criminal Procedure Code Section 388/389/390
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Public Prosecutor
Prosecutor
Muhamad Azmi bin Yusuf
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Case Management and Bail Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether accused charged under section 26A Act 670 (human smuggling) are entitled to bail despite SOSMA s13
- 2 Whether section 388 CPC permits bail for non-bailable offences and on what conditions
- 3 Appropriate and proportionate bail amount and ancillary conditions
Ratio Decidendi
Court granted bail because s388 CPC permits release in non-bailable cases and the Federal Court authority in Koh Chin Wah supports bail for s26A offences; no cogent evidence of flight risk or witness tampering (migrants deported and depositions recorded); bail of RM20,000 with two sureties per accused and conditions (surrender travel documents, monthly police reporting) is just, reasonable, proportionate and not excessive given seriousness of offence; SOSMA objection noted but conflicting apex authority and fundamental liberty led to adopting the interpretation favouring bail.
Court Disposition
Bail granted
Orders
- Each accused to execute a bail bond in the sum of RM20,000 with two sureties
- Accused to surrender travel documents to the Court as condition of bail
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment