WAN NUQMAN DANISH BIN FAREEZ PREM RAJ
Section 41B of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 is a specific statutory provision that renders offences punishable by life or by imprisonment exceeding five years absolutely unbailable and thus overrides the general discretion under s388(1) Criminal Procedure Code; therefore the court has no jurisdiction to grant bail to the accused charged under s39A(2) and the bail application is dismissed.
- Citation
- WA-62D-466-07/2025 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Parties
- Prosecution: Pendakwa Raya; Accused: Wan Nuqman Danish bin Fareez Prem Raj
- Court
- Sessions Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 7 August 2025
- Case Number
- WA-62D-466-07/2025 (Mahkamah Sesyen)
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal (dangerous Drugs Act 1952) / Bail Application (pre Trial)
- Outcome
- Bail application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Unbailable Offence, Statutory Interpretation, Generalia Specialia Derogant
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pendakwa Raya
Prosecution
Wan Nuqman Danish bin Fareez Prem Raj
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal (dangerous Drugs Act 1952) / Bail Application (pre Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an accused charged under s39A(2) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (an offence punishable with life imprisonment or not less than five years) is entitled to bail despite s41B of the Act
- 2 Whether the court retains discretion under s388(1) Criminal Procedure Code to grant bail in circumstances where s41B Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 appears to bar bail
- 3 Whether personal circumstances (age, student status, family ties) or Article 8 equality arguments can displace a specific statutory prohibition on bail
Ratio Decidendi
Section 41B of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 is a specific statutory provision that renders offences punishable by life or by imprisonment exceeding five years absolutely unbailable and thus overrides the general discretion under s388(1) Criminal Procedure Code; therefore the court has no jurisdiction to grant bail to the accused charged under s39A(2) and the bail application is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Bail application dismissed
Orders
- Application for bail refused
- Accused to remain in custody pending disposal of the case
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment