LYNETTE MOEY YU LIN 1. ) MOEY MIN KEN 2. ) AZMAN LIM @ VICTOR LIM KOK EOW
The court held that the documents requested fall within the definition of 'bankers\' books' under the Bankers' Books (Evidence) Act 1949 when given a purposive and updated interpretation; the records are relevant to determine alleged misappropriation and administration of the estate, therefore the plaintiff's application for production was granted with indemnity for banks' compliance costs and costs of the application to be in the cause.
- Citation
- BA-22NCvC-120-03/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Plaintiff; Beneficiary and Acting for Estate of Lim Paik Kim @ Ivy Lim (deceased): Lynette Moey Yu Lin; Defendant; Appointed Executor/trustee Under Deceased's Will: Moey Min Ken; Defendant; Appointed Executor/trustee Under Deceased's Will: Azman Lim @ Victor Lim Kok Eow
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 26 August 2025
- Case Number
- BA-22NCvC-120-03/2025 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit (probate/estate Dispute) / Interlocutory Application Under Bankers' Books (evidence) Act 1949 (sections 6 And/or 7)
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's interlocutory application allowed; banks ordered to produce specified records; plaintiff to indemnify banks' costs for compliance; costs of the application to be costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- Bankers' Books (evidence) Act 1949, Production of Bank Records, Discovery Vs Statutory Procedure, Constructive Trust, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Probate Administration
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lynette Moey Yu Lin
Plaintiff; Beneficiary and Acting for Estate of Lim Paik Kim @ Ivy Lim (deceased)
Moey Min Ken
Defendant; Appointed Executor/trustee Under Deceased's Will
Azman Lim @ Victor Lim Kok Eow
Defendant; Appointed Executor/trustee Under Deceased's Will
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit (probate/estate Dispute) / Interlocutory Application Under Bankers' Books (evidence) Act 1949 (sections 6 And/or 7)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bank documents requested fall within the definition of 'bankers\' books' under the Bankers' Books (Evidence) Act 1949
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to disclosure of bank records for the period requested to determine alleged misappropriation and issues in the estate administration
- 3 Scope and limits of the BBEA as compared to general discovery
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the documents requested fall within the definition of 'bankers\' books' under the Bankers' Books (Evidence) Act 1949 when given a purposive and updated interpretation; the records are relevant to determine alleged misappropriation and administration of the estate, therefore the plaintiff's application for production was granted with indemnity for banks' compliance costs and costs of the application to be in the cause.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's interlocutory application allowed; banks ordered to produce specified records; plaintiff to indemnify banks' costs for compliance; costs of the application to be costs in the cause.
Orders
- Banks (Affin Bank Berhad, Public Bank Berhad, AmBank (M) Berhad, Hong Leong Islamic Bank Berhad and Hong Leong Bank Berhad) are ordered to disclose and/or provide records, including transaction records, statements, deposit receipts and correspondence from January 2017 to date, for the specified accounts of the...
- Plaintiff must indemnify the costs incurred by the named banks in complying with this order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment