Ng Chia How for the Appellant/Judgment Creditor [Messrs Chia Koay & Teng] Ambi Balakrishnan for the Respondent/Judgment Debtor [Messrs Shukor Baljit & Partners]
The BN was defective because it sought the entire judgment costs contrary to the clear terms of the judgment which did not specify joint and several liability; the judgment debtor was only liable to one third of the costs and the bankruptcy court must not go behind the judgment, therefore the registrar's order setting aside the BN is affirmed (though interest on costs may otherwise be claimable under the Rules of Court).
- Citation
- BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS NO. WA-29NCC-3642-11/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: Tom Ole Gysler; Judgment Debtor: Arpan bin Rapaiee
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 9 October 2020
- Case Number
- BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS NO. WA-29NCC-3642-11/2019 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Proceedings (set Aside Bankruptcy Notice) / Appeal Against Penolong Kanan Pendaftar's Decision Allowing Application to Set Aside Bankruptcy Notice
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; registrar's decision to set aside the bankruptcy notice affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Notice, Set Aside Bankruptcy Notice, Joint and Several Liability, Garnishment, Interest on Costs, Compliance With Judgment
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tom Ole Gysler
Judgment Creditor
Arpan bin Rapaiee
Judgment Debtor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Proceedings (set Aside Bankruptcy Notice) / Appeal Against Penolong Kanan Pendaftar's Decision Allowing Application to Set Aside Bankruptcy Notice
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the bankruptcy notice (BN) complied with the terms of the judgment
- 2 Whether the judgment imposed joint and several liability for costs on multiple defendants
- 3 Whether interest on costs was claimable by the judgment creditor
Ratio Decidendi
The BN was defective because it sought the entire judgment costs contrary to the clear terms of the judgment which did not specify joint and several liability; the judgment debtor was only liable to one third of the costs and the bankruptcy court must not go behind the judgment, therefore the registrar's order setting aside the BN is affirmed (though interest on costs may otherwise be claimable under the Rules of Court).
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; registrar's decision to set aside the bankruptcy notice affirmed
Orders
- Enclosure 15 dismissed
- Bankruptcy Notice dated 26.11.2019 set aside as defective
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment