Kho Zen Qi for the Appellant/Judgment Debtor [Messrs Ng, Gan & Partners] SY Liew and Hee Hui Ting for the Respondent/Judgment Creditor [Messrs Shearn Delamore & Co.]
The appeal was dismissed because the judgment debtor failed to comply with s.3(1)(i) Insolvency Act 1967 and related authorities by not quantifying or particularising a genuine counterclaim in affidavit evidence or showing it could not have been raised in the original proceedings; the Canadian Orders had been validly registered in Malaysia and remained unsatisfied, therefore the Bankruptcy Notice was valid and the judgment debtor committed an act of bankruptcy.
- Citation
- DALAM PERKARA KEBANKRAPAN NO. WA-29NCC-739-03/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Debtor: Lim Siew Eng; Judgment Creditor: The University of British Columbia
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2021
- Case Number
- DALAM PERKARA KEBANKRAPAN NO. WA-29NCC-739-03/2020 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy (insolvency Act 1967) / Appeal Against Senior Assistant Registrar's Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Bankruptcy Notice
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; decision of Senior Assistant Registrar dated 13.1.2021 affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Notice, Counterclaim as Defence to Bankruptcy Notice, Recognition and Registration of Foreign Judgments, Setting Aside Bankruptcy Notice, Act of Bankruptcy
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lim Siew Eng
Judgment Debtor
The University of British Columbia
Judgment Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy (insolvency Act 1967) / Appeal Against Senior Assistant Registrar's Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Bankruptcy Notice
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judgment debtor had a quantifiable counterclaim, set off or cross demand sufficient to satisfy s.3(1)(i) Insolvency Act 1967
- 2 Whether the Bankruptcy Notice was valid and an act of bankruptcy was committed
- 3 Whether Canadian orders registered in Malaysia (Malaysian Order) could be impeached or looked behind
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the judgment debtor failed to comply with s.3(1)(i) Insolvency Act 1967 and related authorities by not quantifying or particularising a genuine counterclaim in affidavit evidence or showing it could not have been raised in the original proceedings; the Canadian Orders had been validly registered in Malaysia and remained unsatisfied, therefore the Bankruptcy Notice was valid and the judgment debtor committed an act of bankruptcy.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; decision of Senior Assistant Registrar dated 13.1.2021 affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Decision of the Senior Assistant Registrar dated 13.1.2021 affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment