PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN Lua Ai Siew and Soong Ru Hui (chambering student) for the Judgment Creditors/Respondent [Messrs Soo Thien Ming & Nashrah] PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN Datuk Wong Rhen Yen, Emily Wong and Jasneeta Bhullar for the Judgment Deb
The court held that leave under section 5(3) Insolvency Act 1967 is required before commencing bankruptcy proceedings; however, exercising its discretion the court granted the petitioning creditors' application for leave because the statutory precondition in s5(4) (exhaustion of execution/enforcement) was satisfied...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- KEBANKRAPAN NO. WA-29NCC-40-01/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Debtor: LIM SUE BENG; Judgment Creditor: AmBank (M) Berhad; Judgment Creditor: Alliance Investment Bank Berhad; Judgment Creditor: Malayan Banking Berhad; Judgment Creditor: Malaysian Industrial Development Finance Berhad; Judgment Creditor: CIMB Bank Berhad
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2022
- Case Number
- KEBANKRAPAN NO. WA-29NCC-40-01/2021 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Insolvency / Appeal to Judge in Chambers Against Deputy Registrar Decisions (interlocutory Leave and Applications to Set Aside Bankruptcy Notice)
- Outcome
- Allowed the Judgment Creditors' application for leave (Enclosure 46); dismissed the Judgment Debtor's appeals/enclosures 44, 45 and 66 as academic
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Notice, Leave to Commence Bankruptcy, Section 5(3) Insolvency Act 1967, Winding Up Vs Dissolution, Exhaustion of Execution Measures
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LIM SUE BENG
Judgment Debtor
AmBank (M) Berhad
Judgment Creditor
Alliance Investment Bank Berhad
Judgment Creditor
Malayan Banking Berhad
Judgment Creditor
Malaysian Industrial Development Finance Berhad
Judgment Creditor
CIMB Bank Berhad
Judgment Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Insolvency / Appeal to Judge in Chambers Against Deputy Registrar Decisions (interlocutory Leave and Applications to Set Aside Bankruptcy Notice)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether petitioning creditor must obtain leave of court under section 5(3) Insolvency Act 1967 before issuing a Bankruptcy Notice
- 2 Whether the Bankruptcy Notice (BN) was prematurely issued and whether retrospective leave can cure that defect
- 3 Whether the petitioning creditor has exhausted modes of execution and enforcement under section 5(4) given the principal debtor was wound up
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that leave under section 5(3) Insolvency Act 1967 is required before commencing bankruptcy proceedings; however, exercising its discretion the court granted the petitioning creditors' application for leave because the statutory precondition in s5(4) (exhaustion of execution/enforcement) was satisfied in light of the principal debtor having been wound up, and therefore allowed the creditors to proceed despite the earlier issuance of the Bankruptcy Notice.
Court Disposition
Allowed the Judgment Creditors' application for leave (Enclosure 46); dismissed the Judgment Debtor's appeals/enclosures 44, 45 and 66 as academic
Orders
- Enclosure 46 allowed with costs
- Enclosures 44, 45 and 66 dismissed with no order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment