PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN MAM TEGUH SDN BHD PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN AZMI BIN ARIFIN
The Summons was dismissed because the debtor failed to show ability to pay the full amount stated in the Bankruptcy Notice or to make a bona fide settlement offer; a solitary unsolicited partial payment of RM9,000 did not dispel the act of bankruptcy or bar the petition and the court retains discretion under s6(3) to allow the petition despite reduction below the statutory threshold where payments are partial or not continued.
- Citation
- WA-29NCC-192-02/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: MAM TEGUH SDN BHD; Judgment Debtor: AZMI BIN ARIFIN
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2023
- Case Number
- WA-29NCC-192-02/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Post Decision (summons in Chambers Dismissed; Appeal Filed)
- Outcome
- Summons in Chambers dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Notice, Minimum Threshold Amount, Act of Bankruptcy, Insolvency Rules R116, Section 6(3) Insolvency Act 1967, Court Discretion to Make Bankruptcy Order
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MAM TEGUH SDN BHD
Judgment Creditor
AZMI BIN ARIFIN
Judgment Debtor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Post Decision (summons in Chambers Dismissed; Appeal Filed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimed debt falls below RM100,000 threshold and prevents petition
- 2 Whether partial payment by debtor defeats the Creditor's Petition or the Court retains discretion to make a bankruptcy order
- 3 Whether the Judgment Debtor demonstrated ability to pay full debt or made a bona fide offer of settlement
Ratio Decidendi
The Summons was dismissed because the debtor failed to show ability to pay the full amount stated in the Bankruptcy Notice or to make a bona fide settlement offer; a solitary unsolicited partial payment of RM9,000 did not dispel the act of bankruptcy or bar the petition and the court retains discretion under s6(3) to allow the petition despite reduction below the statutory threshold where payments are partial or not continued.
Court Disposition
Summons in Chambers dismissed
Orders
- Summons in Chambers in Encl. 32 is dismissed with cost of RM 1500 subject to allocator fee.
- Notice in Enclosure 46 is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment