PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN HAI CHER SENG
The court held the debtor's Form 45 notice was defective for failing to specify the statements in the petition disputed and that objections based on failure to exhaust execution against the company and abuse of process were grounds outside Form 45 that required a summons; further, the creditor's petition and verifying affidavit were valid because the deponent's authority was evidenced in the petition and supporting documents and because s6(1) and relevant rules governing verifying affidavits prevail over s133/r215; accordingly the debtor's notice and supporting affidavit were dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- JA-29NCC-648-10/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Parties
- Judgment Debtor: Hai Cher Seng; Judgment Creditor: Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Malaysia
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2024
- Case Number
- JA-29NCC-648-10/2022 (Mahkamah Tinggi)
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Hearing on Debtor's Notice to Show Cause / Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Debtor's notice to show cause and supporting affidavit dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Petition, Notice to Show Cause (form 45 / Kaedah 116/117), Exhaustion of Execution Vs Director Liability, Validity and Authority of Verifying Affidavit (s133, R215), Abuse of Process
- Source Language
- Malay/English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hai Cher Seng
Judgment Debtor
Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja
Judgment Creditor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Hearing on Debtor's Notice to Show Cause / Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the debtor's notice to show cause complied with Insolvency Rules (Form 45 / Kaedah 116/117) by specifying statements disputed
- 2 Whether creditor was required to exhaust execution against the principal company before proceeding against a director for EPF liability
- 3 Whether the verifying affidavit was irregular for failing to state authority under seal (s133 / r215) and whether such irregularity is fatal
Ratio Decidendi
The court held the debtor's Form 45 notice was defective for failing to specify the statements in the petition disputed and that objections based on failure to exhaust execution against the company and abuse of process were grounds outside Form 45 that required a summons; further, the creditor's petition and verifying affidavit were valid because the deponent's authority was evidenced in the petition and supporting documents and because s6(1) and relevant rules governing verifying affidavits prevail over s133/r215; accordingly the debtor's notice and supporting affidavit were dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Debtor's notice to show cause and supporting affidavit dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Notis Niat Penghutang Penghakiman (Lampiran 26) dismissed.
- Afidavit Sokongan (diikrarkan 1.8.2023) (Lampiran 27) dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment